Affiliation:
1. Faculty of education , University of Oulu , Pentti Kaiteran katu 1 , 90014 , Oulu , Finland
Abstract
Abstract
Affectivity has become an operative concept for a variety of analyses of our everyday media-based public communications. However, it often remains unclear what affectivity is and how it can be used for analysing media-based public discussions. To clarify the role of affectivity in such analyses, I take a look back to the classical phenomenological analyses of affectivity provided by Edmund Husserl. I argue that based on Husserl’s analyses, affectivity is essentially a relation between the object and the affected subject evoking (sometimes emotional) responses in the subject. Accordingly, the role of affectivity in the opinion formation and other similar processes in media-based public discussions can be analysed as contingent sedimentations of the object’s such relations to the subject. As my analysis demonstrates, analyses of affectivity in the context of media-based communications do not capture their research object—affectivity—if affectivity is conceived as a feature of the media contents and not as a modality of experience.
Reference61 articles.
1. Ahmed, S. 2006a. “Orientations: Toward a Queer Phenomenology.” GLQ: A Journal of Lesbian and Gay Studies 124: 543–74, https://doi.org/10.1215/10642684-2006-002.
2. Ahmed, S. 2006b. Queer Phenomenology: Orientations, Objects, Others. Durham: Duke University Press.
3. Ahmed, S. 2014. The Cultural Politics of Emotion, 2nd ed. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
4. Al-Saji, A. 2000. “The Site of Affect in Husserl’s Phenomenology: Sensations and the Constitution of the Lived Body.” Philosophy Today, SPEP Supplement 44: 51–60, https://doi.org/10.5840/philtoday200044supplement6.
5. Arendt, H. 1958. The Human Condition. Chicago: Chicago University Press.