Affiliation:
1. University of Helsinki Faculty of Theology , Vuorikatu 3 , Helsinki 00014 , Finland
Abstract
Abstract
This article has a twofold aim. First it is shown, based on Joseph Christopher Greer’s earlier analysis, that there is a close historical, and to some extent substantial, affinity between deep ecology and esotericism. Greer’s findings will be corroborated by applying three different definitions of esotericism to the question at hand. Second, based on Sean McGrath’s ecophilosophy, it will be argued that utilizing esoteric influences systematically in deep ecological context can help deep ecology to avoid some problematic aspects it is often accused of. Especially the esoteric conception of living nature can help deep ecology to bridge the gulf between nature and the human being, and thereby to avoid both theoretical and practical anti-humanism.
Reference16 articles.
1. Bergunder, M. 2010. “What is Esotericism? Cultural Studies Approaches and the Problems of Definition in Religious Studies.” Method & Theory in the Study of Religion 22: 9–36. https://doi.org/10.1163/094330510x12604383550882.
2. Bookchin, M. 1995. Re-Enchanting Humanity: A Defense of the Human Spirit Against Antihumanism, Misanthropy, Mysticism, and Primitivism. London: Cassell & Co.
3. Devall, B., and G. Sessions. 1985. Deep Ecology: Living as if Nature Mattered. Layton: Gibbs Smith.
4. Faivre, A. 1994. Access to Western Esotericism. USA: State University of New York Press.
5. Greer, J. C. 2014. “Deep Ecology and the Study of Western Esotericism.” In Contemporary Esotericism, edited by E. Asprem, and K. Granholm, 287–308. London: Routledge.