Affiliation:
1. Danish School of Media and Journalism , Helsingforsgade 6A , Aarhus , 8200 , Denmark
Abstract
Abstract
Journalists depend on two vectors of trust: the trust invested in them by their sources, and the trust invested in them by their end-users. For many years, trust has become a key issue in the articulation of the journalistic profession. This paper distinguishes between two traditional approaches to earn public trust: either through an emphasis on the ideal of objectivity, or by a sort of showing one’s cards: an explicit declaration of one’s subjectivity. Through a reading of Løgstrup, Derrida, and Deleuze, we argue that both positions are inadequate solutions to the problem of trust. In as much as subjectivity is continuously negotiated in interaction with the unknown and the uncontrollable, the poles of objectivity and subjectivity cannot define the narrative event without each supplementing the other. To escape from this impasse, we suggest a third approach: a hospitable journalism characterized by a hospitable attitude towards the uncontrollable and the strange, or unknown, which operates to make the individual more aware of herself and her place in the world. This invitation happens through a silencing of the self.
Reference55 articles.
1. Baier, A. 1986. “Trust and Antitrust.” Ethics 96 (2): 231–60. https://doi.org/10.1086/292745.
2. Bourdieu, P. 1994. Raisons pratiques: Sur la théorie de l’action. Paris: Seuil.
3. Coady, C. A. J. 2002. Testimony: A Philosophical Study (Reprinted). Oxford: Clarendon Press.
4. Coward, R. 2013. Speaking Personally: The Rise of Subjective and Confessional Journalism. Houndmills, Basingstoke, Hampshire; New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.
5. Deleuze, G. 1995. Negotiations, 1972–1990. New York: Columbia University Press.