Affiliation:
1. Philosophy, Department for the Study of Culture, University of Southern Denmark , Odense , Denmark
Abstract
Abstract
In this article, I investigate how we may include investigations of actual context in the investigation of moral problems in philosophy. The article has three main parts. The focus of the first is a survey of the dominant view of how to incorporate context into moral philosophy and to exemplify this view, I investigate examples from influential introductions to moral philosophy, identifying what I call the assumption of abstraction. In the second part I present three traditions which attribute a more prominent place to context in philosophical work and which therefore offer resources for thinking about context: moral contextualism, particularism and contextualism in political philosophy. Unconvinced that these resources are sufficient for an understanding of how actual context may be of importance in philosophy, I in the third part turn to a systematic investigation of three suggestions for how to incorporate actual context onto philosophy: the application approach, the bottom-up approach and the contextual approach. Furthermore, I argue that the third and most radical approach develops a superior understanding of how to include context in moral philosophy, reflecting the impossibility of making normatively neutral investigations of context in moral philosophy.
Reference48 articles.
1. Annas, J. 2006. “Virtue Ethics.” In The Oxford Handbook of Ethical Theories, edited by D. Copp, 515–36. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
2. Bader, V., and S. Saharso. 2004. “Contextualized Morality and Ethno-Religious Diversity.” Ethical Theory & Moral Practice 7 (2): 107–15, https://doi.org/10.1023/b:etta.0000032758.77152.0a.
3. Baier, A. C. 1985. “What Do Women Want in a Moral Theory?” Noûs 9 (1): 53–63, https://doi.org/10.2307/2215117.
4. Baier, A. C. 1989. “Doing without Moral Theory.” In Anti-Theory in Ethics and Moral Conservatism, edited by S. G. Clarke, and E. Simpson. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
5. Beauchamp, T. L., and J. F. Childress. 1979. Principles of Biomedical Ethics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.