Affiliation:
1. Åbo Akademi University , Turku , Finland
Abstract
Abstract
Wittgenstein suggested that considering the context in which a word or sentence is used may help show the limitations of some ways of setting up a philosophical problem. In this article, I explore the role this suggestion may have in moral (philosophical) reflection, through a consideration of a literary example taken from Jeanette Winterson’s novel, Written on the Body (2001). Using the example to elucidate ways of speaking in love that seem to embody an important truth and ways of acting and thinking that appear to be a denial of that truth, I discuss and attempt to show how different ways of attending to context may reveal the moral dimensions of this language use. I also consider one point at which attention to context seems to come to a halt and when acknowledging what is ethically significant seems to demand something different from us.
Reference19 articles.
1. Anscombe, G. E. M. 1981. The Collected Philosophical Papers of G.E.M. Anscombe, Volume III: Ethics, Religion and Politics. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
2. Christensen, A.-M. S. 2020. “Løgstrup, Levinas and the Mother: Ethics, Love, and the Relationship to the Other.” The Monist 103: 1–15, https://doi.org/10.1093/monist/onz024.
3. Diamond, C. 1991. The Realistic Spirit: Wittgenstein, Philosophy and the Mind. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
4. Diamond, C. 2010. “Murdoch the Explorer.” Philosophical Topics 38 (1): 51–85, https://doi.org/10.5840/philtopics20103813.
5. Diamond, C. 2019. Reading Wittgenstein with Anscombe, Going on to Ethics. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.