Disparities in preconception health indicators in U.S. women: a cross-sectional analysis of the behavioral risk factor surveillance system 2019

Author:

Terry Rachel1ORCID,Gatewood Ashton1,Elenwo Covenant1,Long Abigail2,Wu Wendi2,Markey Caroline3,Strain Shawn4,Hartwell Micah15

Affiliation:

1. Oklahoma State University Center for Health Sciences, Office of Medical Student Research , Tulsa , OK , USA

2. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology , SSM Health St. Anthony Hospital , Oklahoma City , OK , USA

3. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology , University of Oklahoma School of Community Medicine , Tulsa , OK , USA

4. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology , John Peter Smith Hospital , Fort Worth , TX , USA

5. Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences , Oklahoma State University Center for Health Sciences, College of Osteopathic Medicine , Tulsa , OK , USA

Abstract

Abstract Objectives Optimized preconception care improves birth outcomes and women’s health. Yet, little research exists identifying inequities impacting preconception health. This study identifies age, race/ethnicity, education, urbanicity, and income inequities in preconception health. Methods We performed a cross-sectional analysis of the Center for Disease Control and Prevention’s (CDC) 2019 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS). This study included women aged 18–49 years who (1) reported they were not using any type of contraceptive measure during their last sexual encounter (usage of condoms, birth control, etc.) and (2) reported wanting to become pregnant from the BRFSS Family Planning module. Sociodemographic variables included age, race/ethnicity, education, urbanicity, and annual household income. Preconception health indicators were subdivided into three categories of Physical/Mental Health, Healthcare Access, and Behavioral Health. Chi-squared statistical analysis was utilized to identify sociodemographic inequities in preconception health indicators. Results Within the Physical/Mental Health category, we found statistically significant differences among depressive disorder, obesity, high blood pressure, and diabetes. In the Healthcare Access category, we found statistically significant differences in health insurance status, having a primary care doctor, and being able to afford a medical visit. Within the Behavioral Health category, we found statistically significant differences in smoking tobacco, consuming alcohol, exercising in the past 30 days, and fruit and vegetable consumption. Conclusions Maternal mortality and poor maternal health outcomes are influenced by many factors. Further research efforts to identify contributing factors will improve the implementation of targeted preventative measures in directly affected populations to alleviate the current maternal health crisis.

Publisher

Walter de Gruyter GmbH

Subject

Obstetrics and Gynecology,Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health

Reference39 articles.

1. Hoyert, D. Maternal mortality rates in the United States, 2020. NCHS Health E-Stats [Internet]. 2022 [cited 2023 March 22]. Available from: https://doi.org/10.15620/cdc:113967.

2. Health Organization W. Trends in maternal mortality 2000 to 2017: estimates by WHO, UNICEF, UNFPA. World Bank Group and the United Nations Population. Division. 2019 [cited 2023 March 19]. Available from: https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/327595/9789241516488-eng.pdf.

3. Gunja, MZ, Seervai, S, Zephyrin, L, Williams, RDII. Health and health care for women of reproductive age: how the United States compares with other high-income countries [Internet]. Commonwealth Fund; 2022 [cited 2023 March 19]. Available from: https://www.commonwealthfund.org/publications/issue-briefs/2022/mar/health-and-health-care-women-reproductive-age

4. Reduce maternal deaths — healthy people in action - healthy people 2030 [Internet]. [cited 2023 Mar 15]; 2019. Available from: https://health.gov/healthypeople/objectives-and-data/browse-objectives/pregnancy-and-childbirth/reduce-maternal-deaths-mich-04/healthy-people-in-action

5. Hung, P, Liu, J, Norregaard, C, Shih, Y, Liang, C, Zhang, J, et al.. Analysis of residential segregation and racial and ethnic disparities in severe maternal morbidity before and during the COVID-19 pandemic. JAMA Netw Open 2022;5:e2237711. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.37711.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3