Outcomes of cesarean delivery in placenta accreta: conservative delivery vs. cesarean hysterectomy

Abstract

Abstract Objectives To compare delivery outcomes of pregnancies diagnosed with placenta-accreta-syndrome (PAS) who underwent conservative treatment to patients who underwent cesarean hysterectomy. Methods A retrospective study of all women diagnosed with PAS treated in one tertiary medical center between 03/2011 and 11/2020 was performed. Comparison was made between conservative management during cesarean delivery and cesarean hysterectomy. Conservative management included leaving uterus in situ with/without placenta and with/without myometrial resection. Results A total of 249 pregnancies (0.25 % of all deliveries) were diagnosed with PAS, 208 underwent conservative cesarean delivery and 41 had cesarean hysterectomy, 31 of them were unplanned (75.6 %). The median number of previous cesarean deliveries was significantly higher in the cesarean hysterectomy group. There was no difference in the duration from the last cesarean delivery, the presence of placenta previa, pre-operative hemoglobin or platelets levels between the pregnancies with conservative management and the cesarean hysterectomy. Significantly more pregnancies with sonographic suspicion of placenta percreta and bladder invasion had cesarean hysterectomy. Cesarean hysterectomy was significantly associated with earlier delivery, with bleeding and required significantly more blood products. There was no statistically significant difference in the rate of relaparotomy following cesarean delivery or the rate of infections. Multivariable-regression-analysis revealed a significant odds ratio of 3.38 of blood loss of >3,000 mL following cesarean hysterectomy. Conclusions Conservative management in delivery of PAS pregnancies is associated with less bleeding complications during surgery compared to cesarean hysterectomy.