Predictive value of ultrasound in prenatal diagnosis of hypospadias: hints for accurate diagnosis
Author:
Uygur Lutfiye1ORCID, Sivrikoz Tugba Sarac2, Kalelioglu Ibrahim Halil2, Has Recep2, Isguder Cigdem Kunt2, Oktar Tayfun3, Basaran Seher4, Yuksel Atil2
Affiliation:
1. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology , Zeynep Kamil Women and Children Health Research Hospital, Division of Maternal & Fetal Medicine Istanbul , Istanbul , Türkiye 2. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology , Istanbul University, Istanbul Faculty of Medicine, Division of Maternal & Fetal Medicine , Istanbul , Türkiye 3. Department of Urology , Istanbul University, Istanbul Faculty of Medicine , Istanbul , Türkiye 4. Department of Medical Genetics , Istanbul University, Istanbul Faculty of Medicine , Istanbul , Türkiye
Abstract
Abstract
Objectives
This study aims to assess the diagnostic accuracy of targeted ultrasound examination in prenatal diagnosis of hypospadias and to evaluate the predictive values of defined ultrasonographic findings of hypospadias.
Methods
The cases diagnosed with hypospadias in our fetal medicine center were identified on an electronic database. The ultrasound reports, images and hospital records were reviewed retrospectively. The predictive value of prenatal ultrasound diagnosis and the predictive values of each sonographic finding were assessed according to the postnatal clinical examinations.
Results
Thirty-nine cases were diagnosed with hypospadias on ultrasound during the 6 years. Nine fetuses with missing postnatal examination records were excluded. Twentytwo of the remaining fetuses had their prenatal diagnosis of hypospadias confirmed in postnatal examinations, indicating a 73.3 % positive predictive value. Normal external genitalia was detected in postnatal examinations of three fetuses. Five fetuses were diagnosed with other external genital abnormalities, including micropenis (n=2), clitoromegaly (n=2), and buried penis with bifid scrotum (n=1) in postnatal examinations. The positive predictive value of prenatal ultrasound for any external genital abnormality was 90 %.
Conclusions
Although the positive predictive value of ultrasound for genital anomalies is satisfying, it is slightly lower for the specific diagnosis of hypospadias. This reflects overlapping ultrasound findings of different external genitalia anomalies. Standardized, systematic evaluation of the internal and external genital organs, karyotyping and genetic sex determination are essential to achieve a precise prenatal diagnosis of hypospadias.
Publisher
Walter de Gruyter GmbH
Subject
Obstetrics and Gynecology,Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health
Reference26 articles.
1. Kraft, KH, Shukla, AR, Canning, DA. Hypospadias. Urol Clin 2010;37:167–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ucl.2010.03.003. 2. Källén, B, Bertollini, R, Castilla, E, Czeizel, A, Knudsen, LB, Martinez-Frias, ML, et al.. A joint international study on the epidemiology of hypospadias. Acta Paediatr Scand Suppl 1986;324:1–52. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1651-2227.1986.tb14935.x. 3. Calzolari, E, Contiero, MR, Roncarati, E, Mattiuz, PL, Volpato, S. Aetiological factors in hypospadias. J Med Genet 1986;23:333–7. https://doi.org/10.1136/jmg.23.4.333. 4. Devesa, R, Muñoz, A, Torrents, M, Comas, C, Carrera, JM. Prenatal diagnosis of isolated hypospadias. Prenat Diagn 1998;18:779–88. https://doi.org/10.1002/(sici)1097-0223(199808)18:8<779::aid-pd348>3.0.co;2-3. 5. Meizner, I, Mashiach, R, Shalev, J, Efrat, Z, Feldberg, D. The ‘tulip sign’: a sonographic clue for in-utero diagnosis of severe hypospadias. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2002;19:250–3. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1469-0705.2002.00648.x.
|
|