Does delayed cord clamping result in higher maternal blood loss in primary cesarean sections? A retrospective comparative study
Author:
Urech Fabia L.1, Girard Thierry1, Brunner Maya1, Schoetzau Andreas2, Lapaire Olav2
Affiliation:
1. Department of Anesthesiology , 30262 University Hospital Basel , Basel , Switzerland 2. Department of Obstetrics and Antenatal Care , 30262 University Hospital Basel , Basel , Switzerland
Abstract
Abstract
Objectives
The University Hospital Basel implemented delayed umbilical cord clamping of 30–60 s in all laboring women on April 1, 2020. This practice has been widely researched showing substantial benefit for the neonate. Few studies focused on maternal blood loss. The objective of our retrospective comparative study was to assess the impact of immediate vs. delayed cord clamping on maternal blood loss in primary scheduled cesarean sections.
Methods
We analyzed data of 98 women with singleton gestations undergoing primary scheduled cesarean section at term. Data from procedures with early cord clamping (ECC) were compared to those after implementation of delayed cord clamping (DCC). Primary outcomes were perioperative change in maternal hemoglobin levels, estimated and calculated blood loss. Secondary outcomes included duration of cesarean section and neonatal data.
Results
There was a statistically significant difference in the mean perioperative decline of hemoglobin of 10.4 g/L (SD=7.92) and 18.7 g/L (SD=10.4) between the ECC and DCC group, respectively (p<0.001). The estimated (482 mL in ECC vs. 566 mL in DCC (p=0.011)) and the calculated blood loss (438 mL in ECC vs. 715 mL in DCC (p=0.002)) also differed significantly. Secondary outcomes showed no significant differences.
Conclusions
In our study DCC resulted in a statistically significant higher maternal blood loss. In our opinion the widely researched neonatal benefit of DCC outweighs the risk of higher maternal blood loss in low-risk patients. However, maternal risks must be minimized, improvements to preoperative blood management and operative techniques are required.
Publisher
Walter de Gruyter GmbH
Reference16 articles.
1. Colozzi, AE. The New England Journal of Medicine Downloaded from nejm org at UNIVERSITY OF OTAGO on May 20, 2014. For personal use only. No other uses without permission. From the NEJM Archive. Copyright © 2010 Massachusetts Medical Society. All rights reserved. N Engl J Med 1983;308:97–100. 2. Mcdonald, SJ, Middleton, P, Dowswell, T, Morris, PS. Effect of timing of umbilical cord clamping of term infants on maternal and neonatal outcomes. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2013;2013. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD004074.pub3. 3. Andersson, O, Lindquist, B, Lindgren, M, Stjernqvist, K, Domellöf, M, Hellström-Westas, L. Effect of delayed cord clamping on neurodevelopment at 4 years of age: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA Pediatr 2015;169:631–8. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamapediatrics.2015.0358. 4. Mercer, JS, Erickson-Owens, DA, Deoni, SCL, Collins, J, Parker, AB, Wang, M, et al.. Effects of delayed cord clamping on 4-month ferritin levels, brain myelin content, and neurodevelopment: a randomized controlled trial. J Pediatr 2018;203:266–72.e2. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpeds.2018.06.006. 5. Yao, AC, Moinian, M, Lind, J. Distribution of blood between infant and placenta after birth. Lancet 1969;2:871–3. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(69)92328-9.
|
|