Incidence and first trimester risk factors of stillbirth in Indonesia
Author:
Yusrika Mirani Ulfa1ORCID, Al Fattah Adly Nanda12ORCID, Kusuma Raden Aditya13ORCID, Widjaja Felix Firyanto1ORCID, Marizni Shinda1ORCID, Putri Vania Permata12
Affiliation:
1. 633485 Indonesian Prenatal Institute , Jakarta , Indonesia 2. Kosambi Maternal and Children Center , Jakarta , Indonesia 3. Harapan Kita National Women and Children Hospital , Jakarta , Indonesia
Abstract
Abstract
Objectives
To determine the incidence and the risk factors of stillbirth from maternal biophysical, ultrasound, and biochemical markers at 11–13 weeks of gestation in the Indonesian population.
Methods
This was a retrospective cohort study of pregnant women for first-trimester preeclampsia screening at 11–13 weeks of gestation in some clinics and hospital in Jakarta. Maternal characteristics and history, mean arterial pressure (MAP) measurement, uterine artery pulsatility index (UtA-PI) ultrasound, maternal ophthalmic peak ratio (Oph-PR) Doppler, and placental growth factor (PlGF) serum were collected during the visit. Stillbirth was classified into placental dysfunction-related when it occurred with preeclampsia or birth weight <10th percentile and non-placental dysfunction-related. Bivariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were employed to determine the risk factors associated with stillbirth.
Results
Of 1,643 eligible participants, 13 (0.79 %) stillbirth cases were reported. More than half of the stillbirths (7) were placental dysfunction-related. After adjusted with maternal age, body mass index (BMI), and parity status, chronic hypertension (aOR (adjusted odds ratio)) 24.41, 95 % CI {confidence interval} 5.93–100.43), previous pregnancy with preeclampsia (aOR 15.79, 95 % CI 4.42–56.41), MAP >101.85 (aOR 26.67, 95 % CI 8.26–86.06), UtA-PI >1.90 (aOR 10.68, 95 % CI 2.34–48.58, and PlGF <28.77 pg/mL (aOR 18.60, 95 % CI 5.59–61.92) were associated with stillbirth.
Conclusions
The incidence of stillbirth in the population is comparable to studies conducted in developed countries. Most routine variables assessed at the 11–13 weeks combined screening for preeclampsia are associated with the risk of stillbirth.
Publisher
Walter de Gruyter GmbH
Reference37 articles.
1. Lawn, JE, Blencowe, H, Waiswa, P, Amouzou, A, Mathers, C, Hogan, D, et al.. Stillbirths: rates, risk factors, and acceleration towards 2030. Lancet 2016;387:587–603. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(15)00837-5. 2. United Nations Inter-Agency Group for Child Mortality Estimation (UN IGME), You, D, Hug, L, Mishra, A, Blencowe, H, Moran, A. A neglected tragedy : the global burden of stillbirths. New York: UNICEF; 2020. 3. World Health Organization (WHO). Making Every baby count: audit and review of stillbirths and neonatal deaths. Geneva: WHO; 2016. 4. Sun, CC, Chou, HH, Chuang, LL. Trends and risk factors of stillbirth in Taiwan 2006–2013: a population-based study. Arch Gynecol Obstet 2019;299:961–7. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-019-05090-3. 5. Ashoor, G, Syngelaki, A, Papastefanou, I, Nicolaides, KH, Akolekar, R. Development and validation of model for prediction of placental dysfunction-related stillbirth from maternal factors, fetal weight and uterine artery Doppler at mid-gestation. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2022;59:61–8. https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.24795.
|
|