The AccuFlow sensor: a novel digital health tool to assess intrapartum blood loss at cesarean delivery
Author:
Lord Megan G.12ORCID, Gould Alexander J.2, Clark Melissa A.13, Rouse Dwight J.12, Lewkowitz Adam K.12
Affiliation:
1. Division of Maternal Fetal Medicine, Women & Infants Hospital of Rhode Island , Providence , RI , USA 2. Alpert Medical School of Brown University , Providence , RI , USA 3. Department of Health Services, Policy, and Practice , School of Public Health, Brown University , Providence , RI , USA
Abstract
Abstract
Objectives
During obstetric hemorrhage, peripheral vasoconstriction maintains heart rate and blood pressure until compensatory mechanisms are overwhelmed and patients deteriorate rapidly. Real-time perfusion measurements could quantify vasoconstriction, improving early recognition of hemorrhage and facilitating early intervention to reduce morbidity and mortality. The AccuFlow device makes rapid, non-invasive, quantitative measurements of perfusion, but has not been studied for hemorrhage detection or used in surgical settings. This study evaluated feasibility, tolerability, and preliminary efficacy of the AccuFlow for assessment of blood loss at cesarean delivery (CD).
Methods
In this pilot study, sensors were applied to the wrist, forearm, bicep, and chest wall of 25 patients undergoing scheduled CD. Postoperatively, sensors were removed and patients rated the AccuFlow and the standard anesthesia monitoring equipment on a validated comfort rating scale for wearable computers (CRS). Blood loss was estimated by the surgical team (EBL) and calculated from change in hematocrit, weight, and height (CBL). CRS scores were compared via Wilcoxon signed ranks tests. Coefficients of correlation between sensor readings and CBL, and between EBL and CBL, were compared using Fisher’s R-to-z transformation.
Results
There were no safety events; no participants requested device removal. CRS ratings of the AccuFlow and the standard monitoring equipment were similar (7.2 vs. 8.8, p=0.25). Change in wrist perfusion from delivery to dressing placement was more strongly correlated with CBL than was EBL (R=−0.48 vs. R=0.087, p=0.03).
Conclusions
The AccuFlow sensor is well-tolerated and shows promise in detecting intrapartum hemorrhage, though larger studies are needed.
Funder
Division of Maternal Fetal Medicine, Women and Infants Hospital, departmental funds ThermaSENSE Corp
Publisher
Walter de Gruyter GmbH
Subject
Obstetrics and Gynecology,Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health
Reference50 articles.
1. Say, L, Chou, D, Gemmill, A, Tunçalp, Ö, Moller, A-B, Daniels, J, et al.. Global causes of maternal death: a WHO systematic analysis. Lancet Glob Health 2014;2:e323–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/s2214-109x(14)70227-x. 2. Low, JA, Johnston, EE, Mcbride, RL. Blood volume adjustments in the normal obstetric patient with particular reference to the third trimester of pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1965;91:356–63. https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9378(65)90250-4. 3. Schiller, AM, Howard, JT, Convertino, VA. The physiology of blood loss and shock: new insights from a human laboratory model of hemorrhage. Exp Biol Med 2017;242:874–83. https://doi.org/10.1177/1535370217694099. 4. Convertino, VA, Koons, NJ, Suresh, MR. Physiology of human hemorrhage and compensation. Compr Physiol 2021;11:1531–74. https://doi.org/10.1002/cphy.c200016. 5. Mutschler, M, Paffrath, T, Wölfl, C, Probst, C, Nienaber, U, Schipper, IB, et al.. The ATLS(®) classification of hypovolaemic shock: a well established teaching tool on the edge? Injury 2014;45:S35–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2014.08.015.
|
|