Efficacy of procalcitonin and pentraxin-3 as early biomarkers for differential diagnosis of pleural effusions
Author:
Sharma Anita1, Agrawal Apurva2, Sindhwani Girish3, Sharma Ashish4, Tomo Sojit5, Charan Jaykaran5, Yadav Dharmveer5, Sharma Praveen5ORCID
Affiliation:
1. Himalaya Institute of Medical Science, Swami Rama Himalaya University , Dehradun , Uttrakhand , India 2. RNT Medical College, Rajasthan University of Health Science , Udaipur , Rajasthan , India 3. All India Institute of Medical Sciences , Rishikesh , Uttrakhand , India 4. Geetanjali Medical College, Geetanjali University , Udaipur , Rajasthan , India 5. All India Institute of Medical Sciences , Jodhpur , Rajasthan , India
Abstract
Abstract
Objectives
Pleural effusion, defined as an abnormal accumulation of fluid in pleural space, can be of two types: transudative and exudative. The primary aim of the study was to assess the predictive accuracy of procalcitonin (PCT) and pentraxin-3 (PTX-3) in comparison to other biochemical markers such as C-reactive protein (CRP), and adenosine deaminase (ADA) in the differential diagnosis of pleural effusions.
Methods
A cross-sectional analytical study was conducted on patients with pleural effusion. Multiple comparisons and receiver-operating characteristics (ROC) analyses were made to evaluate the diagnostic significance of biochemical markers.
Results
Sixty-six patients with exudative pleural effusion classified as malignant, tuberculous, and parapneumonic effusions (malignant pleural effusion [MPE], tuberculous [TPE], and parapneumonic [PPE]) were included. Significant differences in pleural fluid levels in both PCT (p-value: 0.001) and PTX-3(p-value: 0.001), as well as serum levels of PCT (p-value: 0.001), were observed between the three groups. ROC analysis showed both PTX-3 and PCT having favorable discrimination ability with high sensitivity (≥90%) and specificity to predict PPE from TPE and MPE.
Conclusions
Evaluation of serum and pleural fluid PCT and levels of PTX-3 in the pleural fluid may be used as an early biomarker to differentiate the etiology of pleural effusion.
Publisher
Walter de Gruyter GmbH
Subject
Internal Medicine
Reference31 articles.
1. Fishman, AP, Elias, JA, Fishman, JA, Michael, GA, Robert, SM, Pack, AI. Non-malignant pleural effusion. In: Fishman Alfred, P, editor. Fishmans pulmonary diseases and disorders, 4th ed. New Delhi: McGraw-Hill; 2008:1487–9. 2. Heffner, JE. Discriminating between transudates and exudates. Clin Chest Med 2006;27:241–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ccm.2005.12.008. 3. Samanta, S, Sharma, A, Das, B, Mallick, AK, Kumar, A. Significance of total protein, albumin, globulin, serum effusion albumin gradient and LDH in the differential diagnosis of pleural effusion secondary to tuberculosis and cancer. J Clin Diagn Res 2016;10:14–8. 4. Maskell, NA, Batt, S, Hedley, EL, Davies, CW, Gillespie, SH, Davies, RJ, et al.. The bacteriology of pleural infection by genetic and standard methods and its mortality significance. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2006;174:817–23. https://doi.org/10.1164/rccm.200601-074oc. 5. Daniil, ZD, Zintzaras, E, Kiropoulos, T, Papaioannou, AI, Koutsokera, A, Kastanis, A, et al.. Discrimination of exudative pleural effusions based on multiple biological parameters. Eur Respir J 2007;30:957–64. https://doi.org/10.1183/09031936.00126306.
Cited by
3 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|