Risk factors and clinical outcomes in patients undergoing cytoreductive surgery with concomitant ureteric reimplantation
Author:
Alonso Anais12ORCID, Barat Shoma12ORCID, Kennedy Helen1, Potter Meredith1, Alzahrani Nayef13, Morris David12
Affiliation:
1. Liver and Peritonectomy Unit, St George Hospital , Kogarah , Australia 2. St George and Sutherland Clinical School , University of New South Wales , Kogarah , Australia 3. College of Medicine , Al Imam Mohammad Ibn Saud Islamic University , Riyadh , Saudi Arabia
Abstract
Abstract
Objectives
There are currently scarce data exploring ureteric reimplantation (UR) during cytoreductive surgery (CRS).
Methods
We identified patients undergoing CRS for peritoneal surface malignancies (PSM) of any origin at a single high-volume unit. UR was defined as ureteroureterostomy, transureterouretostomy, ureteroneocystostomy, ureterosigmoidostomy or ileal conduit performed during CRS. Peri-operative outcomes, long-term survival and risk factors for requiring UR were analysed.
Results
Seven hundred and sixty-seven CRSs were identified. Twenty-three (3.0%) procedures involved UR. Bladder resection and colorectal cancer (CRC) were associated with increased risk of UR (bladder resection: OR 12.90, 95% CI 4.91–33.90, p<0.001; CRC: OR 2.51, 95% CI 1.05–6.01, p=0.038). UR did not increase the risk of Grade III–IV morbidity or mortality. The rate of ureteric leak was 3/23 (13.0%) in the UR group. Mean survival was equivocal in patients with CRC (58.14 vs. 34.25 months, p=0.441) but significantly lower in those with high-grade appendiceal mucinous neoplasm (HAMN) undergoing UR (73.98 vs. 30.90 months, p=0.029).
Conclusions
UR during CRS does not increase major morbidity or mortality for carefully selected patients, and is associated with low rates of urologic complications. Whilst decreased survival was apparent in patients with HAMN undergoing UR, it is unclear whether this relationship is causal.
Publisher
Walter de Gruyter GmbH
Subject
Internal Medicine
Reference21 articles.
1. Smeenk, RM, Bex, A, Verwaal, VJ, Horenblas, S, Zoetmulder, FAN. Pseudomyxoma peritonei and the urinary tract: involvement and treatment related complications. J Surg Oncol 2006;93:20–3. https://doi.org/10.1002/jso.20427. 2. Honoré, C, Souadka, A, Goéré, D, Dumont, F, Deschamps, F, Elias, D. HIPEC for peritoneal carcinomatosis: does an associated urologic procedure increase morbidity? Ann Surg Oncol 2012;19:104–9. https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-011-1820-2. 3. Votanopoulos, KI, Randle, RW, Craven, B, Swett, KR, Levine, EA, Shen, P, et al.. Significance of urinary tract involvement in patients treated with cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC). Ann Surg Oncol 2014;21:868–74. https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-013-3354-2. 4. Leapman, MS, Jibara, G, Tabrizian, P, Franssen, B, Yang, M-J, Romanoff, A, et al.. Genitourinary resection at the time of cytoreductive surgery and heated intraperitoneal chemotherapy for peritoneal carcinomatosis is not associated with increased morbidity or worsened oncologic outcomes: a case-matched study. Ann Surg Oncol 2014;21:1153–8. https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-013-3393-8. 5. Lyon, TD, Turner, RMII, Nikonow, TN, Wang, L, Uy, J, Ramalingam, L, et al.. Effect of a concomitant urologic procedure on outcomes following cytoreductive surgery with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy. J Surg Oncol 2016;113:218–22. https://doi.org/10.1002/jso.24115.
|
|