Affiliation:
1. Faculty of Theology, Humboldt-Universitat zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany
Abstract
AbstractThis paper gives a systematic account of Dialectical Theology (DT) and its surprisingly ramified usage of the concept of religion on the backdrop of recent debates about the “return of religion.” First, the positional context between Schleiermacher and Barth is sketched. Second, the highly divergent positions of Bultmann, Barth, Brunner as well as Gogarten and Tillich are presented – always in regard to their sometimes programmatic, sometimes rather hidden references to “religion” between its facticity and normativity. Third and by way of conclusion, it is suggested to restrict “religion” as a concept to non-theological disciplines, i.e., to treat “religion” as a strictly empirical and sociological term, whereas theology is concerned with faith that belongs to a very different game than religion, as DT helps to clarify.
Reference172 articles.
1. “Kritisches und positives Paradox. Eine Auseinandersetzung mit Karl Barth und Friedrich Gogarten.” (1923),1966
2. “Gefühl und Ausdruck. Nicht nur ein Problem der Schleiermacherinterpretation.”,2015
3. “Challenging the Religious Studies Canon: Karl Barth’s Theory of Religion.”;The Journal of Religion,1995
4. “Zum Problem der Entmythologisierung.”,1952
5. “Nachmetaphysische Dreifaltigkeit. Barth, Jüngel und die Transformation der Trinitätslehre.”;Zeitschrift für Theologie und Kirche,2014
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献