Apophatic Confrontation: von Balthasar’s Thought on Kenosis and Community as a Veiled Response to the “Trend” of Political Theology

Author:

Molina Almudena1

Affiliation:

1. Department of Religion, Boston University Graduate School of Arts and Sciences , Boston , United States

Abstract

Abstract This article explores the potential theological–political discourse of Hans Urs von Balthasar, presenting the following arguments: (1) Despite its often-disregarded status, Balthasar’s thought contains a discernible thread of political theology; (2) His exploration of kenosis and community serves as a direct challenge to Schmittian concepts of sovereignty and representation. This challenge opens up new discourses of sovereignty, diverging from the conventional plenipotentiary paradigm and accentuating a vision of community rooted in shared gift; (3) Balthasar’s thought embodies a form of negative political theology, deconstructing and rectifying presupposed categories within the domain of political theology, as his theological principles do not merely establish a direct correspondence between theological concepts and the political realm; moreover, it rejects the analogical correlation drawn between the theological and the political. Lastly, the article concludes that Balthasar’s affirmative Christology offers profound insights into the intricate interplay between religion and politics, thereby catalyzing a reevaluation of contemporary theopolitical discourses.

Publisher

Walter de Gruyter GmbH

Subject

Religious studies

Reference59 articles.

1. Agamben, Giorgio. The Kingdom and the Glory. Meridian. Crossing Aesthetics. Palo Alto: Stanford University Press, 2011.

2. Caldecott, Stratford. “The Social Thought of Hans Urs von Balthasar.” The Catholic Social Science Review 5, no. 5 (2000), 183–90. 10.5840/cssr2000519.

3. Caputo, John D. The Weakness of God a Theology of the Event. Indiana Series in the Philosophy of Religion. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 2006.

4. Casanova, José. Exploring the Postsecular: Three Meanings of “the Secular” and Their Possible Transcendence edited by Craig Calhoun, Eduardo Mendieta, and Jonathan VanAntwerpen. Habermas and Religion. Cambridge: Polity Press, 2013.

5. Chepurin, Kirill and Alex Dubilet eds. Nothing Absolute: German Idealism and the Question of Political Theology. Perspectives in Continental Philosophy. New York: Fordham University Press, 2021. 10.1515/9780823290192.

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3