Affiliation:
1. Department of Religious Studies, Santa Clara University , Santa Clara , United States
Abstract
Abstract
This article explores John’s Exodus rhetoric as a decolonial strategy and maps its implications for contemporary migrants. Other scholars have convincingly argued that local authorities deported John to Patmos as a vagus, because his message opposed civic institutions, but they do not explain the nature and function of his preaching. Using migrant narratives and decolonial theory, I read John’s call to come out of Babylon and his deployment of Exodus topoi as migration rhetoric. He uses topoi of liberation, wilderness wanderings, and promised land to subvert the colonial situation of the assemblies under Rome. Rather than migrating to a place, believers embody the eschatological Exodus by rejecting food offered to idols and upholding the boundaries of Jewish identity as they wait for the full realization of God’s kingdom in the New Jerusalem. Regarding Latinx migrant communities, John’s Exodus rhetoric informs how migrants legitimate their migration and how they negotiate identity and resist imperialism in the US/Mexico borderlands.
Reference82 articles.
1. Alba, Richard. “Mexican Americans and the American Dream.” Perspectives on Politics 4:2 (2006), 289–96.
2. Alsup, John E. “Typology.” In The Anchor Yale Bible Dictionary, edited by David Noel Freedman, 682. New York: Doubleday, 1992.
3. Ando, Clifford. Imperial Ideology and Provincial Loyalty in the Roman Empire. Berkeley: University of California Press, 2000.
4. Barclay, John M. G. Jews in the Mediterranean Diaspora: From Alexander to Trajan (323 BCE–117 CE). London: T&T Clark, 1996.
5. Barr, David L. The Reality of Apocalypse: Rhetoric and Politics in the Book of Revelation. Atlanta: Society of Biblical Literature, 2006.
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献