Affiliation:
1. Department of Theology, Aarhus University , Aarhus , Denmark
Abstract
Abstract
This article begins with an analysis of Adolf von Harnack’s research on biblical and patristic sources in regard to the development of the authoritative church. I provide a close textual analysis of Harnack’s The Origin of the New Testament and the Most Important Consequences of the New Creation (1914). This analysis shows that Harnack regarded biblical and patristic sources as extremely meaningful, as they provide a trustworthy account of the origins of Christianity, but they were also open to critical analysis. I continue this investigation with a close textual reading of Harnack’s correspondence with Karl Barth from 1923, in which the two theologians discussed, among other topics, the possibility of talking about God. I argue that we should place Harnack’s analysis of the biblical and patristic sources within a broader epistemological reflection on the possibilities of human knowledge, to which Harnack dedicated a great deal of attention, even if he did not develop it systematically in his vast literary production.
Reference40 articles.
1. Ayres, Lewis. “Irenaeus and the ‘Rule of Truth’: A Reconsideration.” In The Rise of the Early Christian Intellectual, edited by Lewis Ayres and H. Clifton Ward, 145–64. Berlin: De Gruyter, 2020.
2. Barth, Karl. Der Römerbrief (erste Fassung), 1919. Zürich: Theologischer Verlag, 1985.
3. Bartolomei, Maria Cristina. Ellenizzazione del cristianesimo: linee di critica filosofica e teologica per una interpretazione del problema storico. Roma: L.U. Japadre, 1984.
4. Berding, Helmut. “Leopold von Ranke.” In The Discovery of Historicity in German Idealism and Historism. Studies in Economic Ethics and Philosophy, edited by Peter Koslowski, 41–59. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer, 2005.
5. Capetz, Paul E. “The Old Testament as a Witness to Jesus Christ: Historical Criticism and Theological Exegesis of the Bible According to Karl Barth.” The Journal of Religion 90:4 (2010), 475–506.