Affiliation:
1. MF Norwegian School of Theology, Religion and Society , Oslo , 0302 , Norway
Abstract
Abstract
Empirical research methods have traditionally been absent from and are still foreigners to systematic theology. However, the turn toward practices in academic studies of religion and theology implies that empirical research methodologies cannot be deemed irrelevant to systematic theology. This article explores Hanna Reichel’s theory of theology as design, focusing on the understanding of theology as practice and the potential implications regarding the relevance of empirical methods to systematic theology. Bringing Reichel’s concept of theology as design into dialogue with Geir Afdal’s concept of distributed normativity, this article makes the case that the question of the affordances of a theological interpretation is not only an imperative theological one but also an empirical one, calling for empirical research methods.
Reference35 articles.
1. Afdal, Geir. “Two Concepts of Practice and Theology.” Studia Theologica – Nordic Journal of Theology 75:1 (2021), 6–29.
2. Afdal, Geir. “From Empirical to Impure Theology – Practice as a Strong Programme.” In Practice, Practice Theory and Theology: Scandinavian and German Perspectives, edited by Kirstine H. Johansen and Ulla Schmidt, 75–94. Berlin/Boston: De Gruyter, 2022.
3. Akkerman, Sanne F. and Bakker Arthur. “Boundary Crossing and Boundary Objects.” Review of Educational Research 81:2 (2011), 132–69.
4. Ammerman, Nancy T. Everyday Religion: Observing Modern Religious Lives. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007.
5. Astley, Jeff. Ordinary Theology: Looking, Listening, and Learning in Theology: Explorations in Practical, Pastoral and Empirical Theology. Aldershot: Ashgate, 2002.