Affiliation:
1. Centre for Theology and Religious Studies, Lund University , Lund , Sweden
Abstract
Abstract
Early Christian heresiology is, like polemics in general, a genre that has commonly been negatively perceived in scholarship. There is an idea of heresiological texts as not only historically unreliable, but also unproductive, in contrast to the creative thinking that can be found in theological treatises. Considering the understanding of heresiology as reactive and exclusive, it is not surprising that heresiological works have seldom been examined in reception studies. The present article wants to challenge the idea of heresiological work as merely rejecting heresies in the defence of a pre-existing orthodoxy, by applying a dialogical reading to the work Adversus Iovinianum by Jerome of Stridon, a treatise in which he defended the superiority of virginity over marriage against Jovinian’s idea of the equality of all the baptized. Building on the understanding of dialogue expressed by Mikhail Bakhtin, as well as his concept of hybridity, the article analyses how Jerome, instead of simply rejecting core elements of Jovinian’s ideas, such as the goodness of marriage and the natural condition of human beings, rather reappropriates them and integrates them into his making of orthodoxy. The result is a hybrid construction in which anti-ascetic arguments are integrated in a rhetoric of asceticism.
Reference39 articles.
1. Ambrose
. Epistularum Liber Decimus, Epistulae Extra Collectionem, Gesta Concili Aquileiensis, edited by
Michaela Zelzer
. Vienna: CSEL 82.3, 1982.
2. Augustine
. De Natura et Gratia, edited by
Carl F. Urba
and
Joseph Zycha
, 233–99. Vienna: CSEL 60, 1913.
3. Bakhtin, Mikhail
. The Dialogic Imagination: Four Essays, edited by
Michael Holquist
, translated by
Caryl Emerson
and
Michael Holquist
. Austin: University of Texas Press, 1981.
4. Bell, Michael Mayerfeld
. “Culture as Dialogue.” In Bakhtin and the Human Sciences: No Last Words, edited by
Michael Mayerfeld Bell
and
Michael Gardiner
, 49–62. London: Sage, 1998.
5. Bhabha, Homi K.
“Signs Taken for Wonders: Questions of Ambivalence and Authority under a Tree Outside Delhi, May 1817.” Critical Inquiry 12 (1985), 144–65.