Death from the Perspective of Luhmann’s System Theory

Author:

Sariyar Murat1

Affiliation:

1. Bern University of Appl. Sciences, Department of Medical Informatics , Bern 3012 , Switzerland

Abstract

Abstract The aim of this article is to address the topic of death from a Luhmannian perspective. First, the article will introduce the general theory of Luhmann to provide a background for the way he is tackling sociological and philosophical problems and then will describe its application to religion and deduce various implications for the topic of death. For the discussion of death, we will refer to some of Hegel’s insights, as they motivated central parts of Luhmann’s theory, though he replaced the Hegelian notions with system theoretical ones. Even if it might seem like a further abstraction and mechanization, we assume that it significantly facilitates the combination of outside and inside perspectives on death. In contrast to philosophical existentialism, the system-oriented approach of Luhmann does not emphasize the situated character of human reason and its gaining authenticity by facing death and finitude. Instead, it points to the entanglement of society and consciousness, focusing on the former while providing hints to the otherness of consciousness. Here, authenticity is not achieved by writing about existential topics, but rather through some sort of parallax view.

Publisher

Walter de Gruyter GmbH

Subject

Religious studies

Reference65 articles.

1. Alain-Miller, Jacques and Jacques Lacan. The Seminar of Jacques Lacan: The Ethics Of Psychoanalysis, translated by Dennis Porter, Reprint Edition. New York; London: W. W. Norton & Company, 1997.

2. Andrew, Oberg. “Approaches to Finitude: Death, Self, Others.” Journal of Applied Ethics and Philosophy 10 (2019), 8–17.

3. Anscombe, G. E. M. “Wittgenstein on Rules and Private Language.” Ethics 95, no. 2 (1985), 342–52. 10.1086/292635.

4. Bausch, Kenneth C. “The Habermas/Luhmann Debate and Subsequent Habermasian Perspectives on Systems Theory.” Systems Research and Behavioral Science 14, no. 5 (1997), 315–30.

5. Bryden, Mary. Deleuze and Religion. London: Taylor & Francis Ltd, 2000.

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3