Macroalgal canopies reduce beta diversity in intertidal communities
Author:
Scrosati Ricardo A.1ORCID, Catalán Alexis M.2, Valdivia Nelson3
Affiliation:
1. Department of Biology , St. Francis Xavier University , Antigonish , Nova Scotia B2G 2W5 , Canada 2. Instituto de Ciencias Marinas y Limnológicas, Universidad Austral de Chile , 5090000 Valdivia , Chile 3. Instituto de Ciencias Marinas y Limnológicas and Centro FONDAP de Investigación de la Dinámica de Ecosistemas Marinos de Altas Latitudes (IDEAL) , Universidad Austral de Chile , 5090000 Valdivia , Chile
Abstract
Abstract
Species diversity in a habitat is often termed alpha diversity. As it influences various community properties, many studies have investigated its drivers. For instance, intertidal macroalgal canopies limit understory thermal stress during low tides and thus often increase alpha diversity. More recently, beta diversity has also become of interest. Beta diversity measures the change in species composition across space and is another important attribute of communities because it influences their multifunctionality, productivity, and resilience. Using data from a field experiment done in Atlantic Canada, we tested the hypothesis that fucoid macroalgal canopies limit beta diversity in intertidal communities. This prediction stems from previous evidence that such canopies limit thermal variation across the substrate during low tides, an important consideration because spatial thermal changes influence spatial variability in species composition. To test our hypothesis, we compared two treatments (full canopy cover and canopy removal) created the year before on intertidal areas that were originally all fully covered by canopies. Separately for each treatment, we calculated beta diversity as the Bray-Curtis dissimilarity between nearby quadrats using species abundance data. Overall, fucoid macroalgal canopies significantly reduced beta diversity, showing that these foundation species can have opposing effects on alpha and beta diversity.
Publisher
Walter de Gruyter GmbH
Subject
Plant Science,Aquatic Science,Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
Reference73 articles.
1. Altieri, A.H. and van de Koppel, J. (2014). Foundation species in marine ecosystems. In: Bertness, M.D., Bruno, J.F., Silliman, B.R., and Stachowicz, J.J. (Eds.). Marine community ecology and conservation. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, pp. 37–56. 2. Ang, P.O., Sharp, G.J., and Semple, R.E. (1996). Comparison of the structure of populations of Ascophyllum nodosum (Fucales, Phaeophyta) at sites with different harvesting histories. Hydrobiologia 326/327: 179–184, https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00047804. 3. Appolloni, L., Bevilacqua, S., Sbrescia, L., Sandulli, R., Terlizzi, A., and Russo, G.F. (2017). Does full protection count for the maintenance of β‐diversity patterns in marine communities? Evidence from Mediterranean fish assemblages. Aquat. Conserv. Mar. Freshw. Ecosyst. 27: 828–838, https://doi.org/10.1002/aqc.2750. 4. Appolloni, L., Zeppilli, D., Donnarumma, L., Baldrighi, E., Chianese, E., Russo, G.F., and Sandulli, R. (2020). Seawater acidification affects beta-diversity of benthic communities at a shallow hydrothermal vent in a Mediterranean marine protected area (underwater archaeological park of Baia, Naples, Italy). Diversity 12: 464, https://doi.org/10.3390/d12120464. 5. Beermann, A.J., Ellrich, J.A., Molis, M., and Scrosati, R.A. (2013). Effects of seaweed canopies and adult barnacles on barnacle recruitment: the interplay of positive and negative influences. J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol. 448: 162–170, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jembe.2013.07.001.
Cited by
3 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|