Affiliation:
1. Ankara University , Ankara , Türkiye
Abstract
Abstract
More recently, grammaticalization theorists have become increasingly aware of the role of collocations in grammatical development. One of these roles is to define phonetic reductions and fusion in frequent collocations as constructionalization. Based on frequency of occurrences, the present study explores the implications of high-frequency collocations in Turkish Sign Language for grammaticalization and offers a novel account of constructional change of değİl ‘not’ on usage-based grounds. Specifically, the study suggests that (i) the chunking process is not language-specific within the spoken modality, as noted previously in the literature, (ii) the frequency of collocations is strongly correlated with phonetic reduction and duration, (iii) the fusional characteristics of [sign + değİl] collocations can be classified under four reduced constructional schemas, (iv) the monosyllabicity of a scheme appears to be criterion for it to be productive in signed modality and (v) the semantic changes of frequent [sign + değİl] collocations are related to the notion of subjectification in TİD.
Subject
Linguistics and Language,Developmental and Educational Psychology,Language and Linguistics
Reference64 articles.
1. Antzakas, Klimis. 2006. The use of negative head movements in Greek Sign Language. In Ulrike Zeshan (ed.), Interrogative and negative constructions in sign languages, 258–269. Nijmegen: Ishara Press.
2. Bahan, Benjamin. 1996. Non-manual realization of agreement in American Sign Language. Boston: University of Boston Dissertation.
3. Barðdal, Jóhanna. 2008. Productivity: Evidence form case and argument structure in Icelandic. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
4. Bauer, Laurie. 2001. Morphological productivity [Cambridge Studies in Linguistics 95]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
5. Börstell, Carl, Thomas Hörberg & Robert Östling. 2016. Distribution and duration of signs and parts of speech in Swedish Sign language. Sign Language & Linguistics 19(2). 143–196. https://doi.org/10.1075/sll.19.2.01bor.