Root cause analysis of cases involving diagnosis

Author:

Graber Mark L.1,Castro Gerard M.2,Danforth Missy3,Tilly Jean-Luc3,Croskerry Pat4,El-Kareh Rob5,Hemmalgarn Carole6,Ryan Ruth7,Tozier Michael P.8,Trowbridge Bob8,Wright Julie9,Zwaan Laura10ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Plymouth , MA , USA

2. ATW Health Solutions , Chicago , IL , USA

3. The Leapfrog Group , Washington , DC , USA

4. Emergency Medicine , Dalhousie University , Halifax , NS , Canada

5. University of California , San Diego , USA

6. Georgetown University , Highlands Ranch , CO , USA

7. RiskWriter LLC , Chelsea , MI , USA

8. Maine Medical Center , Portland , ME , USA

9. Intermountain Healthcare

10. Institute of Medical Education Research Rotterdam , Rotterdam , The Netherlands

Abstract

Abstract Diagnostic errors comprise the leading threat to patient safety in healthcare today. Learning how to extract the lessons from cases where diagnosis succeeds or fails is a promising approach to improve diagnostic safety going forward. We present up-to-date and authoritative guidance on how the existing approaches to conducting root cause analyses (RCA’s) can be modified to study cases involving diagnosis. There are several diffierences: In cases involving diagnosis, the investigation should begin immediately after the incident, and clinicians involved in the case should be members of the RCA team. The review must include consideration of how the clinical reasoning process went astray (or succeeded), and use a human-factors perspective to consider the system-related contextual factors in the diagnostic process. We present detailed instructions for conducting RCA’s of cases involving diagnosis, with advice on how to identify root causes and contributing factors and select appropriate interventions.

Funder

Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation

Publisher

Walter de Gruyter GmbH

Reference72 articles.

1. Cook, RI. How complex systems fail. 1998. Available at: https://howcomplexsystemsfail/.

2. Newman-Toker, D, Schaffer, A, Yu-Moe, W, Nassery, N, Saber Tehrani, A, Clements, G, et al.. Serious misdiagnosis-related harms in malpractice claims: the “Big Three” – vascular events, infections, and cancers. Diagnosis 2019;6:227–40. https://doi.org/10.1515/dx-2019-0019.

3. ECRI Institute. Top 10 patient safety concerns for healthcare organizations. 2019. Available at: wwwecriorg/patientsafetytop10.

4. National Patient Safety Foundation. RCA2: improving root cause analyses and actions to prevent harm. 2016. Available at: https://wwwihiorg/resources/tools/rca2-improving-root-cause-analyses-and-actions-prevent-harm#downloads.

5. Association, AH. ASHRM root cause analysis Playbook. 2016.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3