The Slimic Imagination and Elemental Eco-Horror

Author:

Estok Simon C.1

Affiliation:

1. Sungyunkwan University , 53 Myeongnyun-dong 3-ga, Jongno-gu , Seoul 110-745 , South Korea

Abstract

Abstract Slime—elemental to life and to eco-horror—is conceptually entangled with many things, some very unsavory. It is an utterly indifferent element, but for millennia in the popular imagination, it has been an elemental intruder, a border-crosser, an agent with bad intentions. Raced, classed, and gendered, slime is unpredictable and uncontainable. Its very elementality is ambivalent. Scholars have grappled usefully with slime as a theoretical concept, but little has appeared linking specific examples of the raced, classed, and gendered slimic imagination with eco-horror. “The Slimic Imagination and Elemental Eco-horror” begins such a discussion, based on specific literary and filmic examples from a range of historical periods, to show that slime is elementally transmorphous, is liminal in many senses, and that it moves freely across the borders of the living and the dead, the solid and the liquid, the dangerous and the necessary, evoking responses as varied as terror and horror, on the one hand, and joy and excitement on the other. Slime appears in variously devious forms in texts from Dickens to Swift, from Brontë to Stevenson, from Roth to Machen, and from Kenneth Branagh to Ridley Scott—never in the same way, but always in ways that demand political engagement.

Publisher

Walter de Gruyter GmbH

Subject

Literature and Literary Theory,Linguistics and Language,Language and Linguistics

Reference36 articles.

1. Alaimo, S. 2015. “Elemental Love in the Anthropocene.” In Elemental Ecocriticism: Thinking with Earth, Air, Water, and Fire, edited by J. J. Cohen and L. Duckert, 298–309. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

2. “Alien 3: Official Trailer.” 2013. YouTube Video. Movie Trailer 1:20. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ipv1y-Phi7A (accessed November 09, 2021).

3. Brayton, D. 2015. “Shakespeare and Slime: Notes on the Anthropocene.” In Ecological Approaches to Early Modern English Texts. A Field Guide to Reading and Teaching, edited by J. Munroe, E. J. Geisweidt, and L. Bruckner, 81–90. Farnham: Ashgate.

4. Brontë, C. 1971 In Jane Eyre, edited by R. J. Dunn. New York: Norton.

5. Carroll, N. 1990. The Philosophy of Horror, or Paradoxes of the Heart. New York: Routledge.

Cited by 4 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. From the Anthropocene to the Capitalocene and beyond;The Anthropocene Review;2024-08-26

2. Women’s Corporeality and Slime in Shakespeare: Staging the Anthropocene;Primerjalna književnost;2024-05-04

3. Slime, Gender, and Environment: Misogyny’s Slimic Entanglements with Ecophobia;ANQ: A Quarterly Journal of Short Articles, Notes and Reviews;2023-09-12

4. Camus, Roth, Covid-19: the dangers of forgetting;Neohelicon;2021-11-08

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3