Affiliation:
1. Erasmus School of Philosophy , Erasmus University Rotterdam , Rotterdam , Netherlands
Abstract
Abstract
The traditional Lockean justification of property rights has been argued to be no longer valid in a world in which much wealth does not derive from acquisitions of natural resources, and in which much property, such as money, is intangible. This means that libertarians need to reconsider whether and why property rights are justified for objects that fall outside of the scope of the Lockean justification. This paper gives a justification of property rights in relation to modern money, which uses the self-ownership principle as its central premise. Since modern money is a form of credit, I start with a justification of credit property rights. I then consider both money under gold convertibility and present-day fiat systems, showing that the justification of credit property rights remains valid under these conditions.
Subject
Economics, Econometrics and Finance (miscellaneous),Philosophy,Anthropology,Language and Linguistics,Communication,Social Psychology
Reference43 articles.
1. Barnett, R. E. 1986. “Contract Remedies and Inalienable Rights.” Social Philosophy and Policy 4 (1): 179–202, https://doi.org/10.1017/S0265052500000479.
2. Blanchard, O. J. 2018. “Neoclassical Synthesis.” In The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics, edited by Macmillan Publishers Ltd., 9407–12. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
3. Child, J. W. 1990. “The Moral Foundations of Intangible Property.” The Monist 73 (4): 578–600, https://doi.org/10.5840/monist19907346.
4. Cohen, G. A. 1995. Self-Ownership, Freedom, and Equality. Studies in Marxism and Social Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
5. De Nederlandsche, Bank. 2015. “Centrale bank houdt vinger aan de pols bij geldschepping.” https://www.dnb.nl/nieuws/nieuwsoverzicht-en-archief/dnbulletin-2015/dnb325255.jsp (accessed October 3, 2019).