Affiliation:
1. University of Helsinki , Helsinki , Finland
2. Nankai University , Tianjin , China
Abstract
Abstract
The suggestions outlined here include the following. Money is a bundle of institutionally sustained causal powers. Money is an institutional universal instantiated in generic currencies and particular money tokens. John Searle’s account of institutional facts is not helpful for understanding the nature of money as an institution (while it may help to illuminate aspects of the nature of currencies and money particulars). The money universal is not a social convention in David Lewis’s sense (while currencies and money particulars are characterized by high degrees of conventionality). The existence of the money universal is dependent on a larger institutional structure and cannot be understood in terms of collective belief or acceptance or agreement separately focusing on money. These claims have important implications for realism about money.
Subject
Economics, Econometrics and Finance (miscellaneous),Philosophy,Anthropology,Language and Linguistics,Communication,Social Psychology
Reference30 articles.
1. Aglietta, M. 2002. “Whence and Whither Money?” In The Future of Money, 31–72. Paris: OECD Publications.
2. Armstrong, D. M. 1978. Universals and Scientific Realism, Vol. I. Nominalism and Realism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
3. Frankel, S. H. 1977. Two Philosophies of Money. The Conflict of Trust and Authority. Oxford: Basll Blackwell.
4. Frasser, C. and G. Guzmán. 2020. “What Do We Call Money? an Appraisal of the Money or Non-money View.” Journal of Institutional Economics 16: 25–40, https://doi.org/10.1017/s1744137419000419.
5. Guala, F. 2010. “Infallibilism and Human Kinds.” Philosophy of the Social Sciences 40 (2): 244–64, https://doi.org/10.1177/0048393109343114.
Cited by
7 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献