Affiliation:
1. Department of Sociology , Cornell University , 109 Tower Road , Ithaca , NY 14853 , USA
Abstract
Abstract
In this paper two different approaches to social theory are presented, and then illustrated through an in-depth analysis of one study, The Dynamics of Bureaucracy (1955) by Peter M. Blau. The first of these two ideal types focuses on theory as a text, say Suicide by Durkheim or some journal article (theory as a text). According to this viewpoint, which is the conventional one, theory is seen as embodied and finalized in a text, not so different from a literary text. According to the second approach, which is more in the spirit of theorizing, theory is instead seen as a set of interconnected activities (theory as activities). According to this perspective, theory means to engage in a number of activities besides reading: you do research, including work with theoretical issues; you then try to formulate and write down a final version of the theory in an article or a book. A theory is always part of a large set of activities. The paper ends with a comparison of the two perspectives as well as an attempt to see what Blau’s work can add to our understanding of theory as a practical and creative enterprise.
Reference55 articles.
1. Aschenbaum, Andrew, and Daniel Albert. 1995. Profiles in Gerontology: A Biographical Dictionary. New York: Greenwood Press.
2. Blau, Peter M., and Richard Scott. 1962. Formal Organizations: A Comparative Approach. San Francisco: Chandler Publishing Company.
3. Blau, Peter M. 1952. “The Dynamics of Bureaucratic Structure: A Study of Interpersonal Relations in Two Government Agencies.” Dissertation presented at the Department of Sociology, Columbia University.
4. Blau, Peter M. 1955. The Dynamics of Bureaucracy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
5. Blau, Peter M. 1956. Bureaucracy in Modern Society. New York: Random House.
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献