Two Ways of Looking at Theory, Exemplified by The Dynamics of Bureaucracy by Peter M. Blau

Author:

Swedberg Richard1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Sociology , Cornell University , 109 Tower Road , Ithaca , NY 14853 , USA

Abstract

Abstract In this paper two different approaches to social theory are presented, and then illustrated through an in-depth analysis of one study, The Dynamics of Bureaucracy (1955) by Peter M. Blau. The first of these two ideal types focuses on theory as a text, say Suicide by Durkheim or some journal article (theory as a text). According to this viewpoint, which is the conventional one, theory is seen as embodied and finalized in a text, not so different from a literary text. According to the second approach, which is more in the spirit of theorizing, theory is instead seen as a set of interconnected activities (theory as activities). According to this perspective, theory means to engage in a number of activities besides reading: you do research, including work with theoretical issues; you then try to formulate and write down a final version of the theory in an article or a book. A theory is always part of a large set of activities. The paper ends with a comparison of the two perspectives as well as an attempt to see what Blau’s work can add to our understanding of theory as a practical and creative enterprise.

Publisher

Walter de Gruyter GmbH

Reference55 articles.

1. Aschenbaum, Andrew, and Daniel Albert. 1995. Profiles in Gerontology: A Biographical Dictionary. New York: Greenwood Press.

2. Blau, Peter M., and Richard Scott. 1962. Formal Organizations: A Comparative Approach. San Francisco: Chandler Publishing Company.

3. Blau, Peter M. 1952. “The Dynamics of Bureaucratic Structure: A Study of Interpersonal Relations in Two Government Agencies.” Dissertation presented at the Department of Sociology, Columbia University.

4. Blau, Peter M. 1955. The Dynamics of Bureaucracy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

5. Blau, Peter M. 1956. Bureaucracy in Modern Society. New York: Random House.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3