Speaking for Human Being: Institutional Logics, Dragons, and the Supra-Human-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Speaking for Human Being: Institutional Logics, Dragons, and the Supra-Human

Published:2024-04-29 Issue:2 Volume:2 Page:191-227
ISSN:2752-2997
Container-title:Journal of Organizational Sociology
language:en
Short-container-title:

Author:

Friedland Roger¹,Arjaliès Diane-Laure²^ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Emeritus Professor of Religious Studies and Sociology, 8786 The University of California , Santa Barbara , USA

2. Associate Professor, Ivey Business School , 56026 Western University , London , Canada

Abstract

Abstract This essay engages with the mounting published criticism of neo-institutionalism, but from the point of view of the institutional logical approach, one of its descendants. By addressing each of the main critiques: (1) institutional logical theory is tautological; (2) everything is institutional; (3) the absence of politics and power, and (4) its lack of a critical theory - the essay attempts to think how to build a theoretical apparatus able to engage with the current institutional crises of the world.

Publisher

Walter de Gruyter GmbH

Link

https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/joso-2023-0038/pdf

Reference108 articles.

1. Afary, Janet, and Kevin B. Anderson. 2010. Foucault and the Iranian Revolution: Gender and the Seductions of Islamism. University of Chicago Press.

2. Alford, Robert R., and Roger Friedland. 1985. Powers of Theory: Capitalism, the State, and Democracy. Cambridge University Press.

3. Alvesson, Mats, and Martin Blom. 2022. “The Hegemonic Ambiguity of Big Concepts in Organization Studies.” Human Relations 75 (1): 58–86. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726720986847.

4. Alvesson, Mats, and Anna Jonsson. 2022. “Organizational Dischronization: On Meaning and Meaninglessness, Sensemaking and Nonsensemaking.” Journal of Management Studies 59 (3): 724–54. https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.12790.

5. Alvesson, Mats, and André Spicer. 2019. “Neo-institutional Theory and Organization Studies: A Mid-life Crisis?” Organization Studies 40 (2): 199–218. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840618772610.

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Hybrid Organizations – What’s in a Name?;Journal of Organizational Sociology;2024-09-09