Affiliation:
1. National Research Centre for Foreign Language Education/Artificial Intelligence and Human Languages Lab , Beijing Foreign Studies University , Beijing , China
2. Software School/Language Intelligence Research Center, Dalian University of Foreign Languages , Dalian , China
Abstract
Abstract
Concessive clause positioning as a result of multi-cue competition has been widely examined in L1 and L2 English learners. This study furthers the present research by examining competition patterns among contingency, L1 transfer, and salience factors in concessive clause positioning by Chinese EFL learners. We extracted 1,356 concessive subordinations conjoined by although and though from native and learner argumentative essays, and used multifactorial models to examine the effectiveness, tuning tendency, and power ranking of the cues that tune concessive clause positions. A critical contingency competition was tentatively concluded in concessive clause positioning by Chinese EFL learners. That is, in cue consistency across native and learner datasets, contingency values assume the baseline role, which L1 transfer hinders while salience promotes. In addition, a critical contingency value exists, above which L1 transfer effects are not stronger than contingency and salience effects, so that cue consistency would usually be maintained and vice versa.
Funder
Ministry of Education’s Humanities and Social Sciences Research General Project
Subject
Linguistics and Language,Language and Linguistics
Reference59 articles.
1. Arnold, Jennifer E., Anthony Losongco, Thomas Wasow & Ryan Ginstrom. 2000. Heaviness vs. newness: The effects of structural complexity and discourse status on constituent ordering. Language 76(1). 28–55. https://doi.org/10.2307/417392.
2. Azar, Moshe. 1997. Concession relations as argumentation. Text 17(3). 301–316. https://doi.org/10.1515/text.1.1997.17.3.301.
3. Barth, Dagmar. 2000. “that’s true, although not really, but still”: Expressing concession in spoken English. In Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen & Bernd Kortmann (eds.), Cause condition concession contrast: Cognitive and discourse perspective, 411–437. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
4. Bates, Elizabeth & Brian MacWhinney. 1987. Competition, variation and language learning. In Brian MacWhinney (ed.), Mechanism of language acquisition, 157–193. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
5. Biber, Douglas, Stig Johansson, Geoffrey Leech, Susan Conrad & Edward Finegan. 1999. Longman grammar of spoken and written English. London: Longman.