Investigating genre distinctions through discourse distance and discourse network

Author:

Sun Kun1ORCID,Wang Rong23,Xiong Wenxin4

Affiliation:

1. Department of Linguistics , University of Tübingen , Tübingen , Germany

2. Institute of Computational Linguistics, University of Stuttgart , Stuttgart , Germany

3. School of Foreign Languages, Hangzhou Dianzi University , Hangzhou , China

4. School of International Chinese Studies, Beijing Foreign Studies University , Beijing , China

Abstract

Abstract The notion of genre has been widely explored using quantitative methods from both lexical and syntactical perspectives. However, discourse structure has rarely been used to examine genre. Mostly concerned with the interrelation of discourse units, discourse structure can play a crucial role in genre analysis. Nevertheless, few quantitative studies have explored genre distinctions from a discourse structure perspective. Here, we use two English discourse corpora (RST-DT and GUM) to investigate discourse structure from a novel viewpoint. The RST-DT is divided into four small subcorpora distinguished according to genre, and another corpus (GUM) containing seven genres are used for cross-verification. An RST (rhetorical structure theory) tree is converted into dependency representations by taking information from RST annotations to calculate the discourse distance through a process similar to that used to calculate syntactic dependency distance. Moreover, the data on dependency representations deriving from the two corpora are readily convertible into network data. Afterwards, we examine different genres in the two corpora by combining discourse distance and discourse network. The two methods are mutually complementary in comprehensively revealing the distinctiveness of various genres. Accordingly, we propose an effective quantitative method for assessing genre differences using discourse distance and discourse network. This quantitative study can help us better understand the nature of genre.

Publisher

Walter de Gruyter GmbH

Subject

Linguistics and Language,Language and Linguistics

Reference69 articles.

1. Asher, Nicholas & Alex Lascarides. 2003. Logics of conversation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

2. Barabási Albert-László. 2016. Network science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

3. Bax, Stephen. 2010. Discourse and genre: Using language in context. London: Palgrave Macmillan.

4. Beliankou, Andrei, Reinhard Köhler & Sven Naumann. 2012. Quantitative properties of argumentation motifs. In Methods and applications of quantitative linguistics, selected papers of the 8th international conference on quantitative linguistics, 35–43. Belgrade: University of Belgrade.

5. Berzlánovich, Ildikó & Gisela Redeker. 2012. Genre-dependent interaction of coherence and lexical cohesion in written discourse. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory 8(1). 183–208. https://doi.org/10.1515/cllt-2012-0008.

Cited by 3 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Exploring disciplinary authors’ conflict negotiation in published research article discussions;Southern African Linguistics and Applied Language Studies;2024-06-05

2. Literature Review and the Present Study;Dependency Structures from Syntax to Discourse;2023-08-09

3. Tell me how you write and I'll tell you what you read: a study on the writing style of book reviews;Journal of Documentation;2023-06-22

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3