Classroom-ready open-source educational exoskeleton for biomedical and control engineering-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Classroom-ready open-source educational exoskeleton for biomedical and control engineering

Published:2024-05-01 Issue:5 Volume:72 Page:460-475
ISSN:0178-2312
Container-title:at - Automatisierungstechnik
language:en
Short-container-title:

Author:

Al-Tashi Mohammed¹,Lennartson Bengt²,Ortiz-Catalan Max¹³⁴,Just Fabian¹²^ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Center of Bionics and Pain Research , Länsmansgatan 28, 431 30 Mölndal , Sweden

2. Department of Electrical Engineering, Chalmers University of Technology , Chalmersplatsen 5, 42196 , Gothenburg , Sweden

3. Bionics Institute , 384-388 Albert St , East Melbourne, VIC 3002 , Australia

4. Medical Bionics Department, University of Melbourne , Parkville VIC 3052 , Australia

Abstract

Abstract In recent years, robotic arm exoskeletons have emerged as promising tools, finding widespread application in the rehabilitation of neurological disorders and as assistive devices for everyday activities, even alleviating the physical strain on labor-intensive tasks. Despite the growing prominence of exoskeletons in everyday life, a notable knowledge gap exists in the availability of open-source platforms for classroom-ready usage in educational settings. To address this deficiency, we introduce an open-source educational exoskeleton platform aimed at Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM) education. This platform represents an enhancement of the commercial EduExo Pro by AUXIVO, tailored to serve as an educational resource for control engineering and biomedical engineering courses.

Funder

The work was funded by the Solveig and Karl G. Eliasson Memorial Foundation

Publisher

Walter de Gruyter GmbH

Link

https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/auto-2023-0208/pdf

Reference47 articles.

1. Y. H. Weng, C. H. Chen, and C. T. Sun, “Toward the human-robot co-existence society: on safety intelligence for next generation robots,” Int. J. Soc. Robot., vol. 1, no. 4, pp. 267–282, 2009. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12369-009-0019-1.

2. E. Magrini, F. Ferraguti, A. J. Ronga, F. Pini, A. De Luca, and F. Leali, “Human-robot coexistence and interaction in open industrial cells,” Robot. Comput. Integr. Manuf., vol. 61, 2020, Art. no. 101846. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rcim.2019.101846.

3. S. Zhang, S. Li, X. Li, Y. Xiong, and Z. Xie, “A human-robot dynamic fusion safety algorithm for collaborative operations of cobots,” J. Intell. Robot. Syst.: Theory Appl., vol. 104, no. 1, 2022, Art. no. 18. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10846-021-01534-8.

4. A. Arslan, C. Cooper, Z. Khan, I. Golgeci, and I. Ali, “Artificial intelligence and human workers interaction at team level: a conceptual assessment of the challenges and potential HRM strategies,” Int. J. Manpow., vol. 43, no. 1, pp. 75–88, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJM-01-2021-0052.

5. A. Martinetti, P. K. Chemweno, K. Nizamis, and E. Fosch-Villaronga, “Redefining safety in light of human-robot interaction: a critical review of current standards and regulations,” Front. Chem. Eng., vol. 3, no. 666237, pp. 1–12, 2021. https://doi.org/10.3389/fceng.2021.666237.