How to Qualify the Debate on the Public Library by the Use of Research-Developed Tools-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

How to Qualify the Debate on the Public Library by the Use of Research-Developed Tools

Published:2018-06-01 Issue:2 Volume:42 Page:344-350
ISSN:1865-7648
Container-title:Bibliothek Forschung und Praxis
language:en
Short-container-title:

Author:

Jochumsen Henrik¹

Affiliation:

1. Lektor, Associate Professor, Institut for Informationsstudier/Department of Information Studies, Københavns Universitet/University of Copenhagen, South Campus, build. 4, Njalsgade 76, DK-2300 Copenhagen S, Denmark Institut for Informationsstudier Department of Information Studies Københavns Universitet/University of Copenhagen, South Campus, build. 4, Njalsgade 76 DK-2300 Copenhagen S Denmark

Abstract

Abstract The article discusses how it is possible to qualify the debate on public libraries by the use of research based models and concepts and hereby maybe even change the crisis discourse that according to the author characterizes the public debate on current library development. Key-elements are the four-space model, the three-function model and the concept of “New Librarianship”.

Publisher

Walter de Gruyter GmbH

Link

https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/bfp-2018-0041/pdf

Reference14 articles.

1. Bauman, Zigmunt (1998): Globalisation. The Human Consequences. Cambridge, MA: Policy Press.

2. Christoffersen, Henrik; Larsen, Carsten Bo (2017): Folkebiblioteker, bøger og andet godt. CEPOS Arbejdspapir 54, 2017. Available at https://www.cepos.dk/sites/cepos.dk/files/media/documents/arbejdspapirer/arbejdspapir_54_2/arbejdspapir_54_-_folkebiblioteker_boeger_og_andet_godt.pdf. Accessed February 4, 2018.

3. Danish Agency for Library and Media (2010): The public libraries in knowledge society. Summary from the committee on public libraries the knowledge society. Available at https://slks.dk/publikationer/publikationsarkiv-styrelsen-for-bibliotek-og-medier/singlevisning/artikel/the_public_libraries_in_the_knowledge_society/. Accessed February 4, 2018.

4. Giddens, Anthony (1991): Modernity and Self-identity. Self and Society in the Late Modern Age. Cambridge: Polity Press.

5. Hvenegaard Rasmussen, Casper; Jochumsen, Henrik; Skot-Hansen, Dorte (2011): Biblioteket i byudviklingen – oplevelse, kreativitet og innovation. København: Danmarks Biblioteksforening.

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Vertrauen und Verantwortung;Information - Wissenschaft & Praxis;2021-11-11

2. Lernwelten für Bibliotheken – Dimensionen der Zukunftsgestaltung;Bibliothek Forschung und Praxis;2019-04-03