Affiliation:
1. Institute for Communication Technologies , Università della Svizzera italiana , Lugano , Switzerland
2. Department of Communication , University of Washington , Seattle , WA 98195 , USA
Abstract
Abstract
Argumentation is essentially dialogical, hence based on verbal disputation. Nonetheless, other semiotic resources than language may play a substantial role in argumentative circumstances. In this article, different argumentative functions played by photographs are explored, based on an unusual corpus for the field. People working in Mozambican Community Multimedia Centers (CMCs) were interviewed, in order to reconstruct the social meaning they confer to such places. To facilitate the exchange of meanings between interviewees and interviewers, who had different cultural and experiential backgrounds, interviewees were requested to take pictures of something they liked, something they didn’t like, and something they perceived as particularly representative of their CMC. Pictures were then presented and commented by participants during their interview. By means of analytical reconstructions, the major argumentative roles played by photographs in the interviews were identified, as well as their semiotic function in respect to interviewees’ words. Argumentative analysis also broadened and enriched the method of photo-driven interviews, and added a further interpretative access to analysis of social representations.
Subject
Literature and Literary Theory,Linguistics and Language,Language and Linguistics
Reference51 articles.
1. Aakhus, M. 2003. Neither naïve nor critical reconstruction: Dispute mediators, impasse, and the design of argumentation. Argumentation 17(3). 265–290.
2. Aakhus, M. 2007. Communication as design. Communication Monographs 74(1). 112–117.
3. Avgerou, C. & G. Walsham. 2000. Information technology in context: Studies from the perspective of developing countries. London: Ashgate.
4. Barceló Aspeitia, A. A. 2012. Words and images in argumentation. Argumentation 26(3). 355–368.
5. Barthes, Roland. 1964. Rhétorique de l’image. Communications 4. 40–51.