Affiliation:
1. Erasmus University Rotterdam, Department of Public Administration and Sociology , Oudlaan 50 , Rotterdam Netherlands
Abstract
Abstract
This introduction starts by linking the privatization of work-related risk control to a political context in which social investment policies are prominent. Subsequently, a short overview of different forms of privatization is given. Finally, the different contributions to this special issue are introduced by either relating them to the governance or the consequences of privatization. Based on the contributions to the special issue, it is concluded first that the governance of privatized risk control poses difficult challenges of finding the right balance between public objectives and the involvement of private interests. Secondly, it is concluded that, by excluding or marginalizing the most vulnerable group, the privatization of risk control does not always achieve the equality of opportunities that social investment policies aim for. These risks of exclusion and marginalization seem to be particularly salient when the privatization of social investment policies is embedded in a context of retrenchment or a dualization of the labor market.
Reference20 articles.
1. Andersson, Lisa (2018): “Operationalising social investment: from policy dimensions to ideal-types”, Journal of International and Comparative Social Policy 34: 109–125.
2. Benda, Luc (2019): Understanding active labour market policies Rotterdam: Erasmus University Rotterdam.
3. Berkel, Rik van; Borghi, Vando (2008): “Introduction: the governance of activation”, Social Policy & Society 7: 331–340.
4. Bonoli, Giuliano (2004): The politics of new social risks and policies. Presented at the ISA conference RC 19, September 2004, Paris.
5. Cantillon, Bea; Elchardus, Mark; Pestieau, Pierre (2003): De nieuwe sociale kwesties Antwerp: Garant.
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献