Optimal shot selection strategies for the NBA

Author:

Fichman Mark1,O’Brien John Robert2

Affiliation:

1. Carnegie Mellon University, Tepper School of Business , Pittsburgh, PA , USA

2. Carnegie Mellon University, Tepper School of Business , Pittsburgh, PA 15213-3815 , USA , Tel.: 4122683315, e-mail:

Abstract

Abstract In this paper we conduct an equilibrium analysis of the 2015–2016 NBA record breaking season culminating in the dramatic final series upset produced by the Cleveland Cavaliers (CLE) over the Golden State Warriors (GSW). A Stackelberg equilibrium (Conitzer and Sandholm 2006) is constructed for each pair of NBA teams, as a pair of mixed offensive strategies defined over 2- and 3-point shot court locations. The first component corresponds to Team A’s offensive strategy playing against team B’s defense, and the second component is team B’s offensive strategy playing against team A’s defense. The results support the following insights. First, the results suggest that future NBA 3-point averages are headed higher to 37.9%, in contrast with current regular and playoff season averages for the 2015–2016 of 28.6% and 30.9%, respectively. Second, the results provide a means for evaluating the influence of an opposing team’s defense upon offensive strategy. Third, the results provide a strategic interpretation of the final NBA 2015–2016 playoff series where CLE upset GSW. GSW started close to their predicted strategy and then almost monotonically shifted further away whereas CLE moved closer to their predicted strategy. Realized outcomes correlate with these strategic trends.

Publisher

Walter de Gruyter GmbH

Subject

Decision Sciences (miscellaneous),Social Sciences (miscellaneous)

Reference5 articles.

1. Cohen, B. 2018. “The NBA Team With a 4-Point Line.” Wall Street Journal 2017.

2. Cohen, B. 2017. “The Basketball Team That Never Takes a Bad Shot.” Wall Street Journal 2017.

3. Conitzer, V. and T. Sandholm. 2006. “Computing the Optimal Strategy to Commit to.” Proceedings of the ACM Conference of EC, Ann Arbor, MI, USA, 82–90.

4. Conitzer, V. 2016. “On Stackelberg Mixed Strategies.” Synthese (special issue on Logic and the Foundations of Decision and Game Theory) 193(3):689–703.

5. Fichman, M. and J. R. O’Brien. 2018. “Three Point Shooting and Efficient Mixed Strategies: A Portfolio Management Approach.” Journal of Sports Analytics 4:107–120.

Cited by 6 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3