Typical Yet Unlikely and Normally Abnormal: The Intuition Behind High-Dimensional Statistics

Author:

Vowels Matthew J.1

Affiliation:

1. University of Lausanne , Lausanne , Switzerland

Abstract

Abstract Normality, in the colloquial sense, has historically been considered an aspirational trait, synonymous with ideality. The arithmetic average and, by extension, statistics including linear regression coefficients, have often been used to characterize normality, and are often used as a way to summarize samples and identify outliers. We provide intuition behind the behavior of such statistics in high dimensions, and demonstrate that even for datasets with a relatively low number of dimensions, data start to exhibit a number of peculiarities which become severe as the number of dimensions increases. Whilst our main goal is to familiarize researchers with these peculiarities, we also show that normality can be better characterized with ‘typicality’, an information theoretic concept relating to entropy. An application of typicality to both synthetic and real-world data concerning political values reveals that in multi-dimensional space, to be ‘normal’ is actually to be atypical. We briefly explore the ramifications for outlier detection, demonstrating how typicality, in contrast with the popular Mahalanobis distance, represents a viable method for outlier detection.

Publisher

Walter de Gruyter GmbH

Subject

Sociology and Political Science,Statistics and Probability,Economics, Econometrics and Finance (miscellaneous)

Reference41 articles.

1. Blum, A., J. Hopcroft, and R. Kannan. 2020. Foundations of Data Science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

2. Bolger, N., and J. P. Laurenceau. 2013. Intensive Longitudinal Methods. New York: The Guilford Press.

3. Caponi, S. 2013. “Quetelet, the Average Man and Medical Knowledge.” Hist Cienc Saude Manguinhos Hist Cienc Saude Manguinhos 20 (3): 830–47. https://doi.org/10.1590/s0104-59702013005000011.

4. Comte, A. 1976. The Foundation of Sociology, edited by K. Thompson. London: Nelson.

5. Cover, T. M., and J. A. Thomas. 2006. Elements of Information Theory. New York: John Wiley and Sons Inc.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3