Afterword: Running with the Metaphor of Social Invisibility

Author:

Peeren Esther1

Affiliation:

1. Amsterdam School for Cultural Analysis , University of Amsterdam , Postbus 1642 , 1000 BP Amsterdam , The Netherlands

Abstract

Abstract In this afterword, I reflect on the contributions gathered in this special issue, which make clear that social invisibility is multivalent, as visibility, invisibility, and the oscillation between them have different meanings and effects in different social and literary contexts. To the points made about social invisibility in the contributions, I add three more. First, after considering social disappearance as a possible alternative to social invisibility, I conclude that the lack of clear boundaries between these two highly elastic metaphors should not be seen as a problem, but as fruitful: running with both metaphors allows us to arrive at a better understanding of the lives led by particular precaritized groups, and to compare these lives across historical and cultural contexts, as well as across approaches and methods. Second, while social invisibility and social disappearance have predominantly been used to figure disempowerment, it should be acknowledged that escaping notice can also empower. A brief reading of Don DeLillo’s Cosmopolis illustrates the power self-chosen invisibility may impart to the privileged. Third, I argue that humanities approaches to fictionality and narrative and visual form, as found across different types of art and media, provide ways of thinking through social invisibility that add something valuable to empirical and ethnographic approaches in the social sciences. The main reason for this is that narrative and visual form can defamiliarize our perception of the social world, enabling us to notice again or notice differently what has become unremarkable.

Publisher

Walter de Gruyter GmbH

Reference22 articles.

1. DeLillo, D. 2011. Cosmopolis. London: Picador.

2. Derrida, J. 1994. Specters of Marx: The State of the Debt, the Work of Mourning, & the New International. London: Routledge.

3. Douglas, M. 2005. Purity and Danger: An Analysis of Concept of Pollution and Taboo. London: Routledge.

4. Felski, R. 2008. Uses of Literature. New York: John Wiley & Sons.

5. Gatti, G. 2020. “The Social Disappeared.” In Social Disappearance: Explorations Between Latin America and Eastern Europe, edited by E. Schindel, and G. Gatti, 42–58. Berlin: Forum Transregionale Studien.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3