The Political Economy of Trade, Work and Economy: De-globalization – or Re-globalization?

Author:

Smith David A.1,Ciccantell Paul S.2

Affiliation:

1. 8788 University of California Irvine , Irvine , 92697 , USA

2. 4175 Western Michigan University , Kalamazoo , MI , USA

Abstract

Abstract What forces will shape the global future? We begin with discussion of the central roles of globalization and the ecologically destructive Anthropocene and then move onto more current popular and political debates about questions of unchallengeable globalization versus de-globalization and re-globalization. We side with the former. The broad story is how historical global capitalism, with different leading core states or hegemons, inexorably pushed global society into an increasingly tight related connected world-economy, meshed together by commodity webs and supply chains that linked increasingly far-flung locations, geologies, landscapes, and ecosystems. The vision is one of a world-system, embedded to a large degree on market and nation-state capitalism and political power, conflict, and cooperation, that grows more and more tightly integrated, spatially widespread, and ecologically destructive as it expanded for six hundred years. We disagree with a fundamental “break” from the old political economy view. In fact, we are confident that today’s current Anthropocene global consciousness remains – with major concern with climate change and worldwide pandemics. There is little doubt that worldwide globalization is not only needed but essentially inescapable.

Publisher

Walter de Gruyter GmbH

Reference71 articles.

1. Arrighi, G. 1994. The Long Twentieth Century. New York: Verso.

2. Arrighi, G. 2007. Adam Smith in Beijing: Lineages of the Twenty-First Century. New York: Verso.

3. Bair, J. 2005. “Global Commodity Chains: Looking Back, Going Forward.” Competition & Change 9 (2): 153–80. https://doi.org/10.1179/102452905x45382.

4. Bair, J., and M. Werner. 2011. “Commodity Chains and the Uneven Geographies of Global Capitalism: A Disarticulations Perspective.” Environment and Planning, A 43 (5): 988–97. https://doi.org/10.1068/a43505.

5. Bloomberg News. 2020. “Have We Reached Peak Globalization?” January 24.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3