Spatio-temporal deixis and cognitive models in early Indo-European

Author:

Bartolotta Annamaria1

Affiliation:

1. Dipartimento di Scienze Umanistiche , Università di Palermo , Palermo , Italy

Abstract

Abstract This paper is a comparative study based on the linguistic evidence in Vedic Sanskrit and Homeric Greek, aimed at reconstructing the space-time cognitive models used in the Proto-Indo-European language in a diachronic perspective. While it has been widely recognized that ancient Indo-European languages construed earlier (and past) events as in front of later ones, as predicted in the Time-Reference-Point mapping, it is less clear how in the same languages the passage took place from this ‘archaic’ Time-RP model or non-deictic sequence, in which future events are behind or follow the past ones in a temporal sequence, to the more recent ‘post-archaic’ Ego-RP model that is found only from the classical period onwards, in which the future is located in front and the past in back of a deictic observer. Data from the Rigveda and the Homeric poems show that an Ego-RP mapping with an ego-perspective frame of reference (FoR) could not have existed yet at an early Indo-European stage. In particular, spatial terms of front and behind turn out to be used with reference not only to temporal events, but also to east and west respectively, thus presupposing the existence of an absolute field-based FoR which the temporal sequence is metaphorically related to. Specifically, sequence is relative position on a path appears to be motivated by what has been called day orientation frame, in which the different positions of the sun during the day motivate the mapping of front onto ‘earlier’ and behind onto ‘later’, without involving ego’s ‘now’. These findings suggest that early Indo-European still had not made use of spatio-temporal deixis based on the tense-related ego-perspective FoR found in modern languages.

Publisher

Walter de Gruyter GmbH

Subject

Linguistics and Language,Developmental and Educational Psychology,Language and Linguistics

Reference76 articles.

1. Anderson, Stephen R. & Edward L. Keenan. 1985. Deixis. in Timothy Shopen (ed.), Language typology and syntactic description. Vol. III: Grammatical categories and the lexicon, 259–307. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

2. Ariel, Mira. 1998. The linguistic status of the ‘here and now’. Cognitive Linguistics 9(3). 189–237.

3. Aufrecht, Theodor. 1968 [1877]. Die Hymnen des Rigveda 2 vols, 4th edn. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.

4. Avery, John. 1885. The unaugmented verb-forms of the Rig- and Atharva-Vedas. Journal of the American Oriental Society 11. 326–361.

5. Bartolotta, Annamaria. 2003. Towards a reconstruction of Indo-European culture: Semantic functions of IE *men-. in Karlene Jones-Bley, Martin E. Huld, Angela Della Volpe & Miriam Robbins Dexter (eds.), Proceedings of the Fourteenth Annual UCLA Indo-European Conference. Los Angeles, November 8–9,2002, 37–62. Washington, DC: Institute for the Study of Man.

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3