Pit picking vs. Limberg flap vs. primary open method to treat pilonidal sinus disease – A cohort of 327 consecutive patients

Author:

Doll Dietrich12ORCID,Petersen Sven23,Andreae Octavia Alexandra3,Matner Hanne3,Albrecht Henning3,Brügger Lukas E.4,Luedi Markus M.25,Puhl Gero3

Affiliation:

1. Department of Procto-Surgery , St. Marienhospital Vechta, Academic Teaching Hospital of the MHH Hannover , Vechta , Germany

2. Pilonidal Research Group , Vechta , Germany

3. Department of General and Visceral Surgery , Asklepios Klinikum Hamburg-Altona , Hamburg , Germany

4. Department of Visceral Surgery and Medicine , Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern , Bern , Switzerland

5. Department of Anaesthesiology and Pain Medicine , Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern , Bern , Switzerland

Abstract

Abstract Background Minimally invasive methods in pilonidal sinus disease (PSD) surgery are becoming standard. Although long-term results are available for some techniques, long-term outcome data of patients after pit picking is lacking. We aimed at investigating perioperative and long-term outcomes of patients undergoing pit picking, Limberg flap or primary open surgery to treat PSD. Methods In a single-centre observational study, we evaluated the outcomes of 327 consecutive patients undergoing PSD surgery between 2011 and 2020. Results PSD had recurred in 22% of Limberg flap patients and 62% of pit picking patients at 5 years (p=0.0078; log rank test). Previous pilonidal surgeries, smoking, body mass index, immunodeficiency, and diabetes did not significantly influence the long-term recurrence rate. Primary open treatment was performed for 72% of female patients presenting with primary disease. Conclusions Due to its especially dismal long-term results, pit picking should be abandoned, and Limberg flap should be promoted instead, even for primary disease and in females.

Publisher

Walter de Gruyter GmbH

Subject

Surgery

Cited by 9 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3