Law and Technology in the US Law School Industry

Author:

Fish Jessica L. H.1,Haskell John D.1

Affiliation:

1. University of Manchester Law School , Manchester UK

Abstract

Abstract Law schools are increasingly pressured to rethink the character of next generation research, policy impact and curricular training in the wake of computer-oriented technologies. For all its heralded importance and the proliferation of markets and talk around the topic of law and technology within the law school industry, there are still no systematic scholarly attempts to understand how these dynamics currently play out in practice for law schools, what such an investigation might tell us about the present and future composition of legal academia, or how one might begin in the first place to even identify, gather and make sense of data toward these ends. The purpose of this paper is two-fold: on the one hand, to analyse the methodological and theoretical challenges involved in this sort of blended empirical/qualitative study that might be applied to similar studies in any global context, and on the other hand, to draw out a clearer picture of the dynamics of organizational change in US law schools in relation to the phenomena of digital technologies – and all too often underexplored, to unpack some of the dynamics of culture, profession and wealth at play. In more vernacular terms, our aim here is to get a better sense of how and what we talk about when we talk about law and technology as legal academics.

Funder

University of Manchester Law and Technology Initiative

Publisher

Walter de Gruyter GmbH

Subject

Law,Political Science and International Relations

Reference44 articles.

1. Agre, P. 1997. “Toward a Critical Technical Practice: Lessons Learned in Trying to Reform AI.” In Bridging the Great Divide: Social Science, Technical Systems, and Cooperative Work, edited by G. Bowker, L. Gasser, L. Star, and B. Turner, 131–58. New York: Erlbaum.

2. Author. 2020a. “Legal Tech in US Law Schools Data Excel Study.” https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/10aayUbX6Sy_Mgs-1FPfWX09tbci4pjuhLQRooB70Lc/edit?usp=sharing (accessed January 30, 2021).

3. Author. 2020b. “Legal Tech in US Law Schools Data Visualization Study.” https://app.flourish.studio/visualisation/2736840/ (accessed January 30, 2021).

4. Barlow, J. P. 1996. “A Declaration of the Independence of Cyberspace.” January 30, 2021. https://www.eff.org/cyberspace-independence (accessed December 1, 2020).

5. Bassi, J. 2017. A Scientific Pea: How Boulder Became a World Center for Space and Atmospheric Science. Boston: American Meteorological Society.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3