Lobbying and the collective action problem: comparative evidence from enterprise surveys

Author:

Barber Benjamin,Pierskalla Jan,Weschle Simon

Abstract

Industry lobbying is traditionally thought of as a non-excludable good subject to collective action problems that are most easily solved by concentrated industries. However, there is very little empirical support for this hypothesis. In this paper, we address a major shortcoming of existing work on the topic: Its near-exclusive reliance on data from the US. Using comparative firm-level survey data from up to 74 countries, we construct an industry-level indicator of concentration and test its effect on firms’ lobbying activity. Using multilevel Extreme Bounds Analysis and Bayesian Variable Selection techniques to account for model uncertainty, we find no evidence that industry concentration is a predictor of lobbying activity. We discuss the implications of these non-findings for the literature and outline possible avenues for further research.

Publisher

Cambridge University Press (CUP)

Subject

Political Science and International Relations,Industrial relations

Reference139 articles.

1. This approach is able to capture possible differences between countries in what constitutes lobbying, or what a business association or chamber of commerce is. If there are certain things that fall under the definition of lobbying in country X but not in country Y, this will be reflected by a lower propensity to answer “yes” to the lobbying question in country Y. The multilevel models estimate a different intercept for each country, either through random or through fixed effects. This means that differences between countries in the propensity to answer “yes” due to differences in what constitutes lobbying or a business association will be reflected in the model through different intercepts.

2. Coen, Grant, and Wilson (2010);

3. Hojnacki et al. (2012).

4. Basinger and Hallerberg (2004);

5. Acemoglu and Robinson (2006).

Cited by 15 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3