Measuring academic satisfaction in nursing students: a systematic review of the instruments-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Measuring academic satisfaction in nursing students: a systematic review of the instruments

Published:2022-01-01 Issue:1 Volume:19 Page:
ISSN:2194-5772
Container-title:International Journal of Nursing Education Scholarship
language:en
Short-container-title:

Author:

Rossini Silvia¹^ORCID,Mazzotta Rocco¹,Kangasniemi Mari²,Badolamenti Sondra¹,Macale Loreana¹,Sili Alessandro³,Vellone Ercole¹,Alvaro Rosaria¹,Bulfone Giampiera¹

Affiliation:

1. Department of Biomedicine and Prevention , University of Rome Tor Vergata, Rome , Italy

2. Department of Nursing Science, Faculty of Health Sciences , University of Eastern Finland , Kuopio , Finland

3. Policlinico Tor Vergata , Rome , Italy

Abstract

Abstract Student academic satisfaction is one of the most important factors affecting the success and quality of a higher education institute and is an indicator about teaching and learning. This study aims to summarize and critically evaluate the instruments assessing academic satisfaction in nursing education. A systematic review was undertaken, PRISMA were used for the screening of studies. MEDLINE, Cochrane, Scopus and CINAHL were searched using MeSH terms; seven eligible articles were identified referring to five assessment tools. COSMIN was used for evaluation of the methodological of the instruments. The systematic review identified five satisfaction measurement tools used in nursing education. The analysis of the instruments rarely considered a confirmative validity structure, measurement error or criterion validity. The best available instrument was the Nursing Students Satisfaction Scale (NSSS) for validation methodology; however, it needs further validation studies that consider CFA, reliability, criteria validity, hypothesis testing and measurement error.

Publisher

Walter de Gruyter GmbH

Subject

Education,General Nursing

Link

https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/ijnes-2021-0159/pdf

Reference54 articles.

1. Altuntaş, S. (2014). Factors affecting the job satisfaction levels and quit intentions of academic nurses. Nurse Education Today, 34(4), 513–519. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2013.07.002.

2. Ansari, W. E. (2002). Student nurse satisfaction levels with their courses: Part I – effects of demographic variables. Nurse Education Today, 22(2), 159–170. https://doi.org/10.1054/nedt.2001.0682.

3. Anthoine, E., Moret, L., Regnault, A., Sébille, V., & Hardouin, J.-B. (2014). Sample size used to validate a scale: A review of publications on newly-developed patient reported outcomes measures. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 12(1), 2. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12955-014-0176-2.

4. Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84(2), 191–215. https://doi.org/10.1037//0033-295x.84.2.191.

5. Bandura, A. (1995). Self-efficacy in changing societies. Cambridge University Press.

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Evaluating Student Satisfaction and Self-Confidence in Simulation-Based Anesthesiology Training among Final-Year Medical Students;Healthcare;2024-07-31