Writing a compelling integrated discussion: a guide for integrated discussions in article-based theses and dissertations

Author:

Lewis Krystina B.12,Graham Ian D.34,Boland Laura45,Stacey Dawn14

Affiliation:

1. School of Nursing , University of Ottawa , Ottawa , ON , Canada

2. University of Ottawa Heart Institute , Ottawa , ON , Canada

3. School of Epidemiology & Public Health , University of Ottawa , Ottawa , Canada

4. Ottawa Hospital Research Institute , Ottawa , Canada

5. Western University , London , Canada

Abstract

Abstract Article-based theses and dissertations are increasingly being used in nursing and the health sciences as an alternate format to the traditional five-chapter monograph. A unique chapter in the article-based thesis is the integrated discussion, which differs in breadth and depth as compared to the discussion for a traditional thesis monograph or journal article. For many students and faculty, the integrated discussion is a challenging chapter to write, with minimal or no published guidance available. In this article, we offer a four-step approach with templates for planning and writing an integrated discussion. We also share several lessons learned with examples from published theses and dissertations. Writing an integrated discussion can be facilitated and written more efficiently by developing a clear and detailed outline of the chapter and broad discussion points prior to drafting the text, to achieve a higher-level synthesis, analysis, and interpretation of the overall significance of the thesis findings.

Publisher

Walter de Gruyter GmbH

Subject

Education,General Nursing

Reference32 articles.

1. Aarhus University. (2020). Guidelines for assessment of PhD dissertation and PhD defence. Retrieved from https://phd.health.au.dk/doingaphd/dissertation/assessment/guidelinesforassessmentofphddissertationandphddefence/.

2. Anderson, L. W., & Krathwohl, D. R. (2001). A taxonomy for teaching, learning, and assessing: A revision of Bloom’s taxonomy of educational objectives. New York, NY: Longman.

3. Baggs, J. G. (2011). The dissertation manuscript option, internet posting, and publication. Research in Nursing & Health, 34(2), 89–90. https://doi.org/10.1002/nur.20420.

4. Bloom, B. S. (1956). Taxonomy of educational objectives, handbook I: The cognitive domain. New York: David McKay Co Inc.

5. Boland, L. (2018). Implementation of shared decision making in pediatric clinical practice [PhD in Population Health]. Ottawa, Canada: University of Ottawa.

Cited by 3 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3