Setting Aside Arbitral Awards for Contradicting Public Policy According to the Turkish International Arbitration Act-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Setting Aside Arbitral Awards for Contradicting Public Policy According to the Turkish International Arbitration Act

Published:2021-06-28 Issue:0 Volume:0 Page:
ISSN:1934-2640
Container-title:Global Jurist
language:en
Short-container-title:

Author:

Bayata Canyas Asli¹

Affiliation:

1. Bilkent University Faculty of Law , Ankara 06800 , Turkey

Abstract

Abstract This study analyses the setting aside of arbitral awards for contradicting public policy according to the Turkish International Arbitration Act. In a setting aside action, the arbitral award is not scrutinized on its merits; rather, only certain grounds are taken into consideration. One ground that judges evaluate on their own motion is being against public policy. We believe that a more international public policy understanding that is in harmony with the needs and requirements of international arbitration should be adopted.

Publisher

Walter de Gruyter GmbH

Subject

Law,Political Science and International Relations

Link

https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/gj-2021-0038/pdf

Reference36 articles.

1. Abedian, H. 2011. “Judicial Review of Arbitral Awards in International Arbitration- A Case for an Efficient System of Judicial Review.” Journal of International Arbitration 28 (6): 553–90.

2. Akıncı, Z. 1996. “Gerekçesiz Hakem Kararları Türkiye’de Tenfiz Edilebilir mi?” İBD 70 (1–3): 7–16.

3. Akıncı, Z. 2013. Milletlerarası Tahkim. İstanbul: Vedat.

4. Aygül, M. 2014. Milletlerarası Ticari Tahkimde Tahkim Usulüne Uygulanacak Hukuk ve Deliller. İstanbul: On İki Levha.

5. Baron, P. M., and S. Liniger. 2003. “A Second Lokk at Arbitrability.” Arbitration International 19 (1): 27–54, https://doi.org/10.1093/arbitration/19.1.27.