Affiliation:
1. University of Westminster , London , UK
Abstract
Abstract
Crimes such as terrorism pose some of the biggest postmodern challenges faced by criminal justice systems worldwide. How systems react and prevent such crime raises numerous legal, political and strategic issues i.e. cross-jurisdictional collaboration, policing and the erosion of civil liberties such as privacy. In this article, taking inspiration from criminological theory, two criminal justice challenges that are posed by terrorism are explored from the United Kingdom’s perspective: the international definition of terrorism including the factors that impede a common definition from being established and the domestic response to define, prevent and prosecute this crime. The aim of, and originality in, this article is to explore the criminal justice challenge facing the United Kingdom in balancing complex and competing interests when effectively responding to terror crime.
Subject
Law,Political Science and International Relations
Reference123 articles.
1. Abeyratne, R. 2011. “The Beijing Convention of 2010 on the Suppression of Unlawful Acts Relating to International Civil Aviation – an Interpretative Study.” Journal of Transportation Security 4: 131, https://doi.org/10.1007/s12198-011-0062-7.
2. Al-Lami, M. 2009. Studies of Radicalisation: State of the Field Report. London: Department of Politics and International Relations: University of London.
3. Amnesty International. “Encryption: A Matter of Human Rights.” POL40/3682/2016.
4. Archick, K., J. Rollins, and S. Woehrel. 2005. Islamist Extremism in Europe. Washington DC: Congressional Research Service.
5. Ashworth, A. 1977. “Excluding Evidence as Protecting Rights.” Criminal Law Review 3: 723–35.
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献