Author:
Fernández Eliseo,Campbell Cary
Abstract
Abstract
In this article, Fernández examines a remarkable convergence of ideas in Peirce’s mature thought: the Aristotelian notion of causal powers or capacities and its possible combination with some ideas about finality that Kant advanced to make sense of the notion of purpose in the behavior of organisms. He argues that this proposed synthesis deserves to gain relevance in light of new investigations aimed at clarifying issues concerning causality and explanation in science, especially in biology. After reviewing new developments and interpretations concerning the notions of mechanism, teleology, and purpose, especially in regard to their origins in the Kantian tradition, Fernández concludes this trailblazing study by hypothesizing that the characteristic “finality” of biological teleology (manifest in the very idea of purpose) results from the interaction of two basic types of causation: efficient causation and semiotic causation. This a standpoint that incorporates ideas from Peircean semiotics to characterize and justify biological teleology.
Subject
Communication,Language and Linguistics
Reference60 articles.
1. The purposefulness in our thought: A Kantian aid to understanding some essential features of Peirce;Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society,2008
2. Reflexión y lenguaje;Perspectivas de la transformación pragmático-trascendental de la filosofía kantiana. Revista de Filosofía y Teoría Política,2012
3. Evolution of signs, organisms and artifacts as phases of concrete generalization;Biosemiotics,2015a
4. Does Peirce reject transcendental philosophy?;Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie,2011b
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
1. Peircean anti-psychologism and learning theory;Chinese Semiotic Studies;2021-01-14
2. Peirce and learning theory;Chinese Semiotic Studies;2021-01-14