Investigating the potential mechanisms of Litsea cubeba essential oil for anti-melanoma through experimental validation, network pharmacology, and molecular docking analysis
Author:
Yang Xiao-Qin12, Liu Meng-Zhe2, Han Kang-Jia2, Zhao Ping2, Li Liuzemu1, Liu Si-Si1, Yang Bo3, Liu Ru-Kuan1
Affiliation:
1. State Key Laboratory of Utilization of Woody Oil Resource , 373940 Hunan Academy of Forestry , Changsha , China 2. Key Laboratory of National Forestry and Grassland Administration on Highly-Efficient Utilization of Forestry Biomass Resources in Southwest China , 12617 Southwest Forestry University , Kunming , China 3. Workstation for Forestry Seedling and State-Owned Forest Management in Diqing Tibetan Autonomous Prefecture , Diqing , China
Abstract
Abstract
Objectives
Melanoma remains a challenge due to the lack of effective and low-toxicity treatments. Litsea cubeba essential oil (LEO), known for its tyrosinase inhibitory activity, has shown promise as an anti-melanoma compound, although robust scientific evidence is lacking.
Methods
We conducted GC-MS analysis to identify the major components of LEO and screened for effective components were further evaluated on A375 and HaCaT cells using the CCK-8 assay. Network pharmacology was employed to predict potential targets using PharmMapper and SwissTarget Prediction databases, with melanoma-related targets sourced from the GeneCards database. Protein–protein interaction (PPI) network was created using STRING and Cytoscape. Gene Ontology (GO) and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) pathway enrichment analyses were performed through the DAVI database. Additionally, we constructed a natural product-main components-core targets-pathways-disease (NMCPD) network in Cytoscape and conducted molecular docking using PyMOL and Autodock Vina.
Results
GC-MS analysis revealed neral (cis-citral) and geranial (trans-citral) as the primary active components of LEO. Cell assays demonstrated that a citral mixture, in combination with LEO, effectively inhibited A375 cell growth with IC50 values of 35.94 ± 1.23 μM and 12.00 ± 0.96 μg/mL, while exhibiting minimal toxicity to HaCaT cells with IC50 values of 67.72 ± 2.96 μM and 22.32 ± 2.53 μg/mL. Screening identified10 hub targets among 190 common targets between drug and disease-related targets. KEGG pathway enrichment analysis suggested therapeutic effects of citral on melanoma by modulating signaling pathways. Molecular docking revealed strong binding affinity of neral and geranial with RXRA and ESR1, suggesting that citral, the principal LEO component, regulates multiple pathways for potential melanoma therapy.
Conclusions
These findings support the potential utility of LEO as a treatment for melanoma and highlight the importance of exploring tyrosinase inhibitors for the development of novel anti-melanoma drugs.
Funder
Young and Middle-aged Academic and Technological Leaders of Yunnan Province Foundation of State Key Laboratory of Utilization of Woody Oil Resource
Publisher
Walter de Gruyter GmbH
Reference53 articles.
1. Qiu, Y, Yu, Y, Lan, P, Wang, Y, Li, Y. An overview on total valorization of Litsea cubeba as a new woody oil plant resource toward a zero-waste biorefinery. Molecules 2021;26:3948. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules26133948. 2. Sivamaruthi, BS, Kesika, P, Chaiyasut, C. The composition, pharmacological and economic importance of essential oil of Litsea cubeba (Lour.) Pers. Food Sci Tech 2022;42:e35720. https://doi.org/10.1590/fst.35720. 3. Hao, K, Xu, B, Zhang, G, Si, H. Antibacterial activity and mechanism of Litsea cubeba L. essential oil against Acinetobacter baumannii. Nat Prod Commun 2021;16:3. https://doi.org/10.1177/1934578x21999146. 4. Borotová, P, Galovičová, L, Vukovic, NL, Vukic, M, Kunová, S, Hanus, P, et al.. Role of Litsea cubeba essential oil in agricultural products safety: antioxidant and antimicrobial applications. Plants 2022;11:1504. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants11111504. 5. Wang, X, Gao, M, Wu, L, Zhao, Y, Wang, Y, Chen, Y. Antimicrobial activity of essential oils extracted from Litsea cubeba. For Res 2022;2:2. https://doi.org/10.48130/fr-2022-0002.
|
|