Investigating the safety and feasibility of osteopathic medicine in the pediatric oncology outpatient setting
Author:
Belsky Jennifer A.12, Stanek Joseph R.3, Rose Melissa J.34
Affiliation:
1. Division of Pediatric Hematology/Oncology/BMT , Riley Hospital for Children , Indianapolis , IN , USA 2. Department of Pediatrics , Indiana University , Indianapolis , IN , USA 3. Division of Pediatric Hematology/Oncology/BMT , Nationwide Children’s Hospital , Columbus , OH , USA 4. Department of Pediatrics , The Ohio State University , Columbus , OH , USA
Abstract
Abstract
Context
Pediatric patients receiving chemotherapy experience unwanted therapy-induced side effects, commonly constipation and pain that diminish quality of life. To date, few studies have investigated the safety and feasibility of osteopathic manipulative treatment (OMT) in pediatric oncology.
Objectives
The primary objective of this study is to investigate the safety and feasibility of OMT in pediatric oncology outpatient clinics.
Methods
This is a single institutional pilot study evaluating children aged ≥2–21 years receiving chemotherapy for an oncological diagnosis at Nationwide Children’s Hospital (NCH). Permission was obtained from the NCH Institutional Review Board. Participants were enrolled for 8 weeks and received weekly OMT. OMT was deemed feasible by participating in six out of eight weekly treatments, and safety was assessed through adverse event grading per Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE). During the clinic visit, patients answered validated surveys on constipation (Bristol Stool Scale) and pain (FACES Scale) pre/post-OMT. Feasibility was analyzed utilizing a one-sided exact binomial test while validated tools and adverse events were summarized descriptively.
Results
A total of 23 patients were enrolled, with 21 included in feasibility analyses. The majority of the patients were female (n=13, 61.9%), with a median age of 12 years at enrollment (range, 2.7–20.8 years). There were no serious adverse events attributed to OMT intervention, and among the patients assessed for feasibility, 100% of them participated in at least two-thirds of their weekly OMT treatments, meeting our defined feasibility criteria. The intervention lasted an average of 14.2 min (range, 7.2–19.2 min). There were no FACES or Bristol Stool Scale scores that correlated with worsening pain on constipation post-OMT intervention.
Conclusions
Pediatric oncology patients were feasibly and safely able to receive OMT during a regularly scheduled chemotherapy visit. The limitations include the small sample size. These findings support the need to further investigate the safety and feasibility, as well as efficacy, of OMT in the pediatric oncology clinical setting.
Publisher
Walter de Gruyter GmbH
Subject
Complementary and alternative medicine,Complementary and Manual Therapy
Reference32 articles.
1. Ramirez, LY, Huestis, SE, Yap, TY, Zyzanski, S, Drotar, D, Kodish, E. Potential chemotherapy side effects: what do oncologists tell parents? Pediatr Blood Cancer 2009;52:497–502. https://doi.org/10.1002/pbc.21835. 2. Mora, E, Smith, EM, Donohoe, C, Hertz, DL. Vincristine-induced peripheral neuropathy in pediatric cancer patients. Am J Cancer Res 2016;6:2416–30. 3. Loeffen, EAH, Kremer, LCM, Mulder, RL, Font-Gonzalez, A, Dupuis, LL, Sung, L, et al.. The importance of evidence-based supportive care practice guidelines in childhood cancer-a plea for their development and implementation. Support Care Cancer 2017;25:1121–5. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-016-3501-y. 4. Belsky, JA, Stanek, J, Skeens, MA, Gerhardt, CA, Rose, MJ. Supportive care and osteopathic medicine in pediatric oncology: perspectives of current oncology clinicians, caregivers, and patients. Support Care Cancer 2021;29:1121–8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-020-05612-9. 5. Health NCfCaI. Complementary, alternative, or integrative health: what’s in a name? 2019. [Accessed 22 Jan 2020].
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|