The impact of self-efficacy on nonoperative treatment of atraumatic shoulder pain
Author:
Grandizio Louis C.1, Choe Lisa J.1, Follett Lisa1, Laychur Andrew1, Young Amanda1
Affiliation:
1. Geisinger Commonwealth School of Medicine, Geisinger Musculoskeletal Institute , 100 N. Academy Avenue , Danville , PA , USA
Abstract
Abstract
Context
Atraumatic shoulder pain is frequently encountered in primary care and surgical clinics. With increased recognition of the biopsychosocial model, there has been an increased emphasis on identifying patient factors associated with less effective coping strategies such as pain catastrophizing. It remains uncertain what impact self-efficacy has on the response to nonoperative treatment of shoulder pain.
Objectives
Our purpose is to determine the influence of patient coping strategies (self-efficacy) on the outcome of nonoperative treatment of atraumatic shoulder pain. We hypothesize that higher levels of self-efficacy are associated with increased self-reported function after nonoperative treatment.
Methods
We conducted a retrospective case-control study for a consecutive series of patients seen in our clinic with nonoperatively managed atraumatic shoulder pain. Baseline demographics and range of motion were recorded. Patients completed the Simple Shoulder Test (SST), PROMIS Pain Interference (PI), and PROMIS Self-Efficacy for Managing Symptoms (SE). After 3 months of nonoperative treatment, patients were placed into two groups: patients who clinically improved (Group 1) and those that did not (Group 2), with clinical improvement defined as an increase of 2 or greater on the SST.
Results
Seventy-eight patients returned for follow-up and completed all questionnaires. There were no statistically significant differences for age, sex, or tobacco use between the two groups. Half of the patients in our series had symptoms for >12 months, with rotator cuff syndrome being the most frequent diagnosis (40.0%). Patients in Group 1 had significantly higher PROMIS SE scores (42 vs. 39, p=0.0094) at initial evaluation. At 3-month follow-up, patients in Group 1 also had significantly lower Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS) scores (4.5 vs. 6.5, p=0.0067), compared to Group 2.
Conclusions
Patients who experience clinical improvement with nonoperative treatment of atraumatic shoulder conditions demonstrate higher self-efficacy than patients who fail to improve. Guiding patients with atraumatic shoulder pain and low self-efficacy toward interventions aimed at improving coping strategies, rather than addressing musculoskeletal factors alone, may contribute to the goal of improving outcomes.
Publisher
Walter de Gruyter GmbH
Subject
Complementary and alternative medicine,Complementary and Manual Therapy
Reference26 articles.
1. Marder, RA, Kim, SH, Labson, JD, Hunter, JC. Injection of the subacromial bursa in patients with rotator cuff syndrome: a prospective, randomized study comparing the effectiveness of different routes. J Bone Joint Surg 2012;94:1442–7. https://doi.org/10.2106/jbjs.k.00534. 2. Kuhn, JE, Dunn, WR, Sanders, R, An, Q, Baumgarten, KM, Bishop, JY, et al.. Effectiveness of physical therapy in treating atraumatic full-thickness rotator cuff tears: a multicenter prospective cohort study. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2013;22:1371–279. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2013.01.026. 3. Mantone, JK, Burkhead, WZJr, Noonan, JJr. Nonoperative treatment of rotator cuff tears. Orthop Clin N Am 2000;31:295–311. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0030-5898(05)70149-8. 4. Koester, MC, Dunn, WR, Kuhn, JE, Spindler, KP. The efficacy of subacromial corticosteroid injection in the treatment of rotator cuff disease: a systematic review. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 2007;15:3–11. https://doi.org/10.5435/00124635-200701000-00002. 5. Min, KS, Pierre, PS, Ryan, PM, Marchant, BG, Wilson, CJ, Arrington, ED. A double-blind randomized controlled trial comparing the effects of subacromial injection with corticosteroid versus NSAID in patients with shoulder impingement syndrome. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2013;22:595–601. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2012.08.026.
|
|